How a WA lab tests shellfish for dangerous toxins

The Seattle Times covers an incredibly important but little known lab that checks local shellfish for toxins. Given the recent closing of virtually all shellfish harvesting in the Hood Canal and nearby, this is worth reading. One of the scientists in the lab is quoted as saying that the recent closure was the worse outbreak he’s seen in 25 years. Another small example of the issues we face with global warming from our never ending use of fossil fuels.

The story is behind the Seattle Times paywall, but I recommend supporting the work of the Times.

Here at the Washington State Department of Health’s humble (read: small) public health lab, scientists process hundreds of samples of shellfish each week to help keep people safe from illness. If you like to shuck ‘em, enjoy a chowder or geoduck ceviche, these are some of the people you can thank. And their work is becoming more important as Washington warms due to climate change.

https://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/climate-lab/how-a-wa-lab-that-tests-shellfish-for-dangerous-toxins

Event: Stream Stewards – Salmon Biology & Restoration

Here’s a great volunteer opportunity to get you outside and into the stream of things! Watching salmon counting in the stream was a fun morning. Plus you’ll see places you rarely get to see without being part of one of these trainings. Check it out

The Stream Stewards Program, originally developed by Washington State University’s Jefferson County Extension and now hosted by the Salmon Coalition, provides Jefferson and Clallam County residents with the opportunity to turn environmental knowledge into action. Through this 5-week course, participants learn about connections between our lands and waters by diving into topics such as stream ecology and restoration, salmon biology and habitats, managing urban watersheds, riparian forests, tribal roles in restoration, and fisheries management. You will connect with local natural resource experts in classroom sessions and field experiences and learn about opportunities to get involved in local efforts to steward and restore our local watersheds.

Upon completion, volunteers are asked to commit to 20 volunteer hours to an organization of their choice over the following year. Volunteer hours can be applied to a wide range of opportunities that work toward the larger goal of improving local ecosystem health. From getting involved in a citizen science project to engaging in public outreach, volunteers can connect with opportunities that fit their skills and interests. Through this program, we hope to connect you to many of these organizations that host volunteer opportunities.

Throughout the training, organizations will provide participants with information about local projects and offer exciting opportunities to plug in and make a difference on the Olympic Peninsula.

The 5-week course fee will be $100 and classes will take place every Wednesday in September from 9am – 2pm at various locations in Jefferson and Clallam Counties.

Want to just take one or two of the classes? We have now opened up single session registration. You can register for one or multiple sessions individually. Each single session is $25.

WA shellfish growers worry for future after Hood Canal closure – Seattle Times

A toxin, Alexandrium catenella cells have been found in shellfish in Hood Canal. It’s closed down shellfish harvesting during this summer. The question is, “Is this the new normal”?


“We start to have to plan around this more and think about — going forward — what our business model would look like if we weren’t selling in the hot months anymore at all,” Wight said.

https://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/climate-lab/wa-shellfish-growers-worry-for-future-after-hood-canal-closure

Behind a paywall.

Pollinator problem: A new predator is stalking mason bees

As usual, the growth of a pollinator to help honeybees is now bringing its own problems…we know so little about what we are doing. I’m one of the people who bought a Mason bee hotel thinking it would help pollinate my apple trees.


The backyard conservation success of Mason bee hotels brings with it the unexpected consequence of providing infiltration by the parasite Houdini fly. Michael Williams writes. (Columbia Insight)

The houdini fly’s method of infiltration is ingenious. Adult fles inflate their heads to break through the mud wall of the mason bee’s brood chamber. Female flies then lay eggs on the pollen and nectar provisions meant for mason bee larvae. When houdini fly maggots emerge they eat the food meant for the mason bee larvae, causing the young bees to starve.

https://columbiainsight.org/pollinator-problem-a-new-predator-is-stalking-mason-bees

Washington’s heat wave has marine scientists keeping a close eye on Puget Sound – FOX NEWS

Twice a week this summer, divers from the Point Defiance Zoo & Aquarium have been surveying bull kelp forests off Owen Beach in Tacoma, documenting the underwater ecosystem and tracking changes from year to year as part of a broader statewide effort to restore 10,000 acres of underwater forest by 2040. Lauren Donovan reports. (Fox 13)

During the FOX 13 dive, Schare recorded a water temperature of 55 degrees Fahrenheit at a depth of 39 feet.

“During the winter that’s even considered pretty high,” he said. “To see that tens of feet underwater in the summer is quite alarming.”

He said rising surface temperatures are putting additional stress on bull kelp, which thrives in cooler water, generally in the upper 40s to low 50s Fahrenheit.

Good short story reporting by FOX news in Tacoma.

https://www.fox13seattle.com/news/warm-weather-puget-sound-ecosystems

Looking back over 200 years of the salmon killing tire chemical 6PPD

Fascinating story. Untangling chemical names and looking back over 200 years of 6PPD history.

The tire chemical 6PPD is known worldwide for its deadly effect on salmon, but it also has a complex history. We look at how this history connects to important breakthroughs in modern transportation and medicine and how the unique chemical structure of 6PPD makes it an environmental hazard.

https://www.eopugetsound.org/article/history-and-chemical-structure-tire-chemical-6ppd-q

And for a more comprehensive look at the issue we face with tires killing salmon, read any of the stories at the following link.

https://www.eopugetsound.org/seeking-alternatives-to-6PPD

The false promise of Carbon Capture

The politicians have done it again. Promises of gains from an unproven technology to shut up the “greens”. At least with Trump we know we have no chance of any lies from the Federal Government. It’s all up to us. They won’t help.

Canada’s promises to capture carbon span almost 20 years, with little gains.


Stephen Harper swore by it; Mark Carney is ready to invest taxpayer dollars in it. A Narwhal investigation reveals how Canadian politicians have bought into an unproven technology they tout as a climate fix. Carl Meyer reports. (The Narwhal).

Solar generated more power than coal for the first time in US history

This posted today from the great website Chartr. If you don’t subscribe to it you should. There is nothing that Trump can do to bring back coal, it’s on its way out. Gas fired is replacing it, with solar a distant second.


At the same time that the Trump administration is pushing further toward coal power, announcing plans only last week to invest almost $700 million into reviving the industry, a key renewable energy source has just hit a major milestone in the US.

New data from energy think tank Ember, released Wednesday, shows that solar supplied 12.8% of US energy generation in May — marking not only the highest share ever recorded for the clean energy source, but also the first time that solar has generated more monthly energy than coal in the US, which supplied 12.2%.

The figure for May denotes the fourth-lowest monthly share that coal has ever seen, only slightly greater than the all-time low of 11.7% observed for April. From 1984 until 2010, coal was America’s largest source of energy. However, as the fossil fuel continues to fall out of favor, that share has been almost cut in half in the last five years alone.

Meanwhile, demand for renewables like solar has boomed as America’s energy use keeps surging to new highs. On top of surpassing coal last month, solar became the third-largest source of electricity overall in the US, behind natural gas and nuclear, and remains the nation’s fastest-growing power source, per Climate Central.

Even after the Trump administration terminated $7 billion in solar project funding last August, it seems the energy source remains a clear bright spot. Another report released this week from the Solar Energy Industries Association found that the US added 7.8 gigawatts of new solar capacity in the first quarter of 2026 across more than 6 million solar installations nationwide.

https://sherwood.news/world/solar-generated-more-power-than-coal-in-the-us-for-the-first-time-ever/

Ocean Harvests of Puget Sound Chinook Were Significantly Underestimated for Decades

The Wild Fish Conservancy is highlighting the latest outrage by the very people who were put in charge of protecting wild salmon in Canada. We were hopeful during the last few decades that science based fish monitoring would help produce the right amount of catch to allow the Chinook to recover. Instead, it was all just a ruse to allow the open ocean fishing to continue in larger numbers than were being reported. Many of us following this issue had worries that Canadian Commissioners were in a very cozy relationship with the sports fishing and open ocean industries in Canada. We knew that these commissions were often filled with the very people that were supposed to be managed. As usual, the fox was put in charge of the henhouse. But I’m going to let the press release from Wild Fish Conservancy speak for itself.


While Orcas and Salmon Declined, Ocean Harvests of Puget Sound Chinook Were Significantly Underestimated for Decades


Revised Pacific Salmon Commission data reveal substantially more Puget Sound Chinook were intercepted in ocean fisheries over a twenty-year period, harming local communities and undermining decades of salmon and orca recovery efforts.

For Immediate Release
June 10, 2026

PUGET SOUND, WA—Newly revised data released by Canada at the Pacific Salmon Commission shows that for more than two decades ocean fisheries have killed thousands more Endangered Species Act-listed Puget Sound Chinook salmon each year than previously understood. The corrected estimates reveal far higher harvest mortality in British Columbia’s ocean recreational fisheries, with cascading consequences: lost opportunities to recover Puget Sound Chinook, less prey for endangered Southern Resident orcas, and tighter constraints on local fishing communities.

The scope of the oversight raises hard questions for the fishing families, Tribal Nations, and communities who spent decades accepting closed or curtailed fishing seasons, funding recovery efforts, and backing major conservation measures under the assumption that substantially more Chinook were surviving ocean harvest. It also raises concerns about transparency and accountability, as revisions with major implications for salmon recovery and fishing opportunity were incorporated into technical management processes with little to no public explanation.

For two decades, fisheries managers set salmon recovery targets, determined harvest limits, and assessed prey availability for endangered Southern Resident killer whales while relying on inaccurate data that failed to reflect the true scale of ocean interceptions. In some Central and North Puget Sound watersheds, including the Nooksack, Skagit, and Stillaguamish rivers, revised estimates show that Alaska and British Columbia interception rates exceeded a stunning 60% of returning adult Chinook before those fish reached Puget Sound waters. During this same period, many of these rivers repeatedly failed to meet recovery goals and Southern Resident killer whales continued to decline.

Interception fisheries are an unfortunate product of outdated management frameworks enshrined in the Pacific Salmon Treaty. Even before the revised estimates, distant ocean fisheries were already intercepting far more Chinook from Puget Sound watersheds than fisheries closer to home. According to Pacific Salmon Commission data, ocean fisheries in British Columbia and Alaska harvest roughly four to six times more Chinook from the Nooksack, Skagit, Stillaguamish, and Snohomish watersheds than all local Puget Sound tribal, commercial, and recreational fisheries combined. Meanwhile, many local fisheries in Puget Sound have lost most opportunities to harvest returning Chinook from their own watersheds. For example, in 2025, the Stillaguamish Tribe was limited to a ceremonial harvest of only 26 Chinook salmon. 

The revised estimates followed an update to the accounting method used by fisheries managers in British Columbia. The previous method, in place for two decades, had significantly understated Chinook harvest and mortality in ‘mixed-stock ocean fisheries’, where weak and recovering salmon populations from rivers coastwide are indiscriminately harvested alongside healthier stocks across vast marine areas.

“We already knew Puget Sound Chinook and Southern Resident killer whales were in crisis,” said Dr. Nick Gayeski, Senior Ecologist with Wild Fish Conservancy. “Canada’s underestimate of recreational Chinook harvest show that ocean interceptions were substantially higher than previously understood during a critical period for Chinook and killer whale recovery. These findings expose the profound uncertainty and risk inherent in attempting to manage salmon populations from rivers coastwide in large mixed-stock ocean fisheries.”

More than 25 years after Puget Sound Chinook salmon were listed under the Endangered Species Act (ESA), many of the populations that make up the listed stock remain far below recovery goals and are now identified as “in crisis” by Washington’s Governor’s Salmon Recovery Office. Southern Resident killer whales were listed as endangered under the ESA in 2005 and have declined approximately 20% over the last two decades to just 76 whales today. Reduced prey availability, particularly large and abundant Chinook, has been identified by killer whale experts and NOAA Fisheries as the leading cause of the whales’ decline. Recent research suggests that reducing ocean interceptions of Chinook salmon before they reach critical Southern Resident killer whale feeding areas could substantially increase prey availability, including modeled increases of up to 25% in Chinook abundance within whale critical habitat.

Importantly, the revised data are not an isolated anomaly or merely a technical correction. They reveal a broader structural problem in attempting to manage salmon populations in mixed-stock ocean fisheries. Despite increasingly sophisticated monitoring and modeling, uncertainty remains high and populations continue to be overharvested under this system.

The new data underscore that uncertainty and raise an important question: if one correction can dramatically change estimates of Chinook mortality, what other sources of uncertainty and risk remain within the management system?

“For decades, fisheries management has prioritized maximizing extraction in mixed-stock ocean fisheries rather than maximizing salmon recovery,” said Emma Helverson, Executive Director for Wild Fish Conservancy. “That approach is failing Chinook salmon, Southern Resident killer whales, tribal treaty fisheries, and fishing communities alike. Ironically, maximizing short-term ocean harvest is reducing long-term fishing opportunities across the coast. Recovering salmon will require transformational changes in where, when, and how fishing occurs to ensure more fish survive to return home.”

This new understanding comes at a consequential time when the U.S. and Canada prepare to renegotiate the Pacific Salmon Treaty, the international agreement that governs coastwide salmon harvest and many of the mixed-stock ocean fisheries now facing renewed scrutiny. Across the Pacific Coast, communities are increasingly calling for major fisheries reforms to reduce interceptions and transition harvest closer to rivers and estuaries, where salmon can be more selectively and sustainably managed as they return home. 

“The Pacific Salmon Treaty renegotiation is happening right now and offers a once-in-a-decade opportunity to redirect salmon management toward a more sustainable and equitable path,” said Helverson. “We do not have another decade to wait. Chinook salmon, Southern Resident killer whales, and coastal communities are already paying the price for a management system that is failing to rebuild abundance. This is the moment for transformational change.”

Updated Chinook mortality distribution tables and stock-specific harvest data are publicly available through the Pacific Salmon Commission Chinook Technical Committee data portal and data application.

Pacific Salmon Commission Chinook Technical Committee. Annual Report of Catch and Escapement for 2024. Appendix C: Comparison of Historic and Updated Canadian Recreational Catch and Release Estimates is available here for download: Pacific Salmon Commission Appendix C Data Tables

###

Wild Fish Conservancy is a nonprofit conservation organization headquartered in Washington State and working from California to Alaska to preserve, protect and restore the northwest’s wild fish and the ecosystems they depend on, through science, education, and advocacy. wildfishconservancy.org 

I highly recommend that you support the efforts of the Wild Fish Conservancy.

New research on wild vs hatchery steelhead

A new study has just come out that helps better understand how to rear hatchery steelhead salmon without impacting genetic diversity, which has been a key concern of wild salmon advocates for years. The findings show that if wild salmon are allowed to spawn naturally, and then the eggs are collected for rearing in a hatchery, that the genetic risks were lessened. This is good news for both sides of the debate, as it shows that hatchery rearing of wild collected eggs may not be a threat to genetic diversity, or at least that’s the way I read it. The authors do state that “…While the longer-term genetic effects were not assessed in this study, other programs have realized reduced genetic diversity during similar timeframes.”


ABSTRACT

Declining salmonid populations often prompt the use of captive-reared fish to supplement wild stocks, but such programs risk negative genetic and ecological impacts. We evaluated six steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss) populations in the Hood Canal watershed, Puget Sound, Washington, including three supplemented and three unsupplemented control populations, over the span of 17 years to assess the effects of supplementation on several population genetics metrics. This program uniquely allowed natural spawning to occur before removing eyed eggs from redds for captive rearing, and later release as smolts or adults. Key genetic metrics—expected heterozygosity, allelic richness, and effective population size—remained stable from before to after supplementation in both the supplemented and non-supplemented populations. Parentage analyses confirmed successful reproduction by captively reared adults after they were released into the wild. These findings suggest that natural spawning prior to captive rearing, among other aspects of the program, lessened the genetic risks typically associated with artificial propagation such as loss of genetic diversity, or a reduction in effective population size. Our results highlight the potential for carefully designed supplementation programs to conserve genetic diversity and maintain effective population sizes in threatened steelhead populations.

Introduction

Supplementation programs, where captive-reared fish are introduced into wild populations to enhance natural production and increase abundance, have been widely implemented as a conservation strategy for declining salmonid populations. However, previous studies have highlighted several potential drawbacks of supplementation efforts, including genetic and ecological risks that may outweigh the intended benefits [1–7]. Understanding these risks is critical because the long-term success of supplementation programs depends not only on their ability to increase population sizes but also on their capacity to maintain the genetic health of these populations. Careful genetic monitoring is therefore essential to assess the effectiveness of these efforts and prevent unintended harm.

You can read the whole article here:

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0339458

Northwest just finished warmest fall on record, scientists report and NCAR Research shutdown

The Washington State Standard is reporting that not only did we finish the year with the warmest year on record but our recent rain will not do much to help the ongoing drought in central and eastern Washington. Why? Because it’s falling as rain and not as snow.

This record warm spell includes all temperature data going back to 1880. These floods, this warming, is exactly what scientists have been predicting for decades. Now we reap what we have sown in fossil fuel use. So what is the government doing? It’s shutting down research on the atmosphere.

The Trump Administration has announced the closing of the greatest atmospheric research lab in the world, at National Science Foundation’s National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR), the largest federal climate research lab outside Boulder in Colorado. This cynical ploy to rob of us global climate data is directly linked to the fossil fuel industry that underpins this administrations every action. Every drop of gas one buys is funding this destruction of our most valuable commodity, the scientific research to understand the processes of our planet. The announcement was made by OMB chair Russell Voight, the author of Project 2025. His statement said, “This facility is one of the largest sources of climate alarmism in the country…” without providing any evidence except his own opinion.

The Governor of Colorado stated, “Climate change is real, but the work of NCAR goes far beyond climate science,” Polis said. “NCAR delivers data around severe weather events like fires and floods that help our country save lives and property, and prevent devastation for families. If these cuts move forward we will lose our competitive advantage against foreign powers and adversaries in the pursuit of scientific discovery.”

If you supported Trump and the politicians who make up his sycophant society you are helping support these disastrous decisions that continue to destroy our country and turn us into something resembling the Soviet Union or worse. Clearly our Senators and House members do not support this shut down of NCAR Colorado. Is this the kind of country you want to leave to your children and grandchildren?

This is not Making America Great Again, it’s an attempt to create a totalitarian government based on the beliefs of the fossil fuel industry. Better rethink your support of this maniac and act now to stop him before it’s too late. Send your donations to the ACLU and other organizations fighting for out rights. Contact friends in Red states to make sure they have heard this news and tell them to contact their Federal representatives to overturn this insane dictate.

You can support a green economy now by buying or leasing electric vehicles, walking and biking whenever possible, donating to the national organizations fighting the administration in court and supporting local farmers who strengthen our resilience to the effects of climate change .

Our hope is when this administration is finally out of office, that we can rebuild better the destroyed institutions that they have worked to eliminate in the name of the gas station of yours down the street. But that will take more than words on a blog. It takes every one of us doing something to change the direction of this out of control ship of state.

https://www.nbcnews.com/science/climate-change/trump-administration-break-climate-research-center-ncar-rcna249668

New concerns over PFAS in drinking water

Wired magazine has just run a major exposé on ground water contamination with PFAS on military bases and its likely connection to a significant rise in Parkinson’s Disease. This is a story I would highly recommend reading and subscribing to Wired to support their journalism efforts.

“New ideas about chronic illness could revolutionize treatment, if we take the research seriously.“

https://www.wired.com/story/scientists-thought-parkinsons-was-in-our-genes-it-might-be-in-the-water

Back in 2016, we carried an article about the contamination of groundwater at the Navy base on Whidbey Island.

The Navy did publish the work on testing wells in the areas around the bases.

From the information copied from the links below, it is clear that the Navy was trying to find the level of exposure to PFAS in drinking wells, but it’s important to note that they were not looking for Parkinson’s Disease, only three kinds of cancers: testicular, kidney and prostate.. They do list a comprehensive list of bases where they were testing here: https://media.defense.gov/2020/Mar/17/2002265607/-1/-1/1/SPREADSHEET_OF_INSTALLATIONS_WHERE_DOD_PERFORMING_ASSESSMENT_OF_PFAS_USE_OR_POTENTIAL_RELEASE.PDF

Follow the story:

From the web: https://www.hillandponton.com/toxic-exposure/naval-air-station-whidbey-island/

Whidbey Island Water Contamination 

Naval Air Station Whidbey Island has been identified as a significant source of PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances) contamination in the surrounding communities. These “forever chemicals,” which have been used in industry and consumer products since the 1940s due to their resistance to grease, oil, water, and heat, were present in the Aqueous Film Forming Foam (AFFF) used for firefighting and training purposes at the base. 

Beyond PFAS contamination, Whidbey Island’s groundwater faces other threats including potential saltwater intrusion and nitrate runoff from fertilizers, animal waste, and septic systems, prompting increased focus on testing the island’s wells. 

PFAS Contamination

In early 2017, testing by the U.S. Navy near NAS Whidbey Island revealed PFAS levels above the EPA’s lifetime health advisory level of 70 parts per trillion (ppt) PFOA/PFOS. One well showed contamination as high as 2,516 ppt, more than 35 times the advisory level. A more recent Navy sample taken in 2022 showed a certain cancer-causing particulate in drinking water at levels 30,000 times higher than what the EPA considered safe. 

The Navy is currently conducting investigations at multiple locations including the Area 6 Landfill, Ault Field, OLF Coupeville, and Seaplane Base.

291 wells have already been tested near Ault Field, Area 6, and Coupeville. The Navy reported 18 contaminated wells, though it’s unclear how many homes these wells served and there may be many other drinking water sources likely to be contaminated. 

To-date, the Navy has sampled over 360 private drinking water wells near NAS Whidbey Island Area 6 Landfill, Ault Field, and OLF Coupeville. Of these, certain PFAS have been detected at or above the DoD PFAS interim action levels for PFAS in private drinking water wells in over thirty drinking water wells. 

PFAS exposure has been linked to various types of cancers and serious health issues, raising significant public health concerns for residents in the affected areas. If you developed a medical condition after living or working at or near NAS Whidbey Island, you may be eligible for compensation. Get a free case evaluation here to explore your legal options. 


Wired story documents the first major study that showed that bases without PFAS in their water supply had dramatically lower case’s of Parkinson’s than those that did.


“Camp Pendleton, in Southern California, is the Marine Corps’ West Coast equivalent to Lejeune. Thousands of young, healthy Marines shuffle through its barbed-wired gates each year. But Pendleton has one thing Lejeune does not: uncontaminated drinking water.

When Goldman compared both populations, the results were shocking: Marines exposed to TCE at Lejeune were 70 percent more likely to have Parkinson’s than those stationed at Pendleton. And in a follow-up study last year, he showed that disease progression in Lejeune vets with the highest exposure to TCE was faster than those with low or no exposure, too. In the world of Parkinson’s research, Goldman’s study was a blockbuster.”

The military has been downplaying and lying to us for decades about health issues. Was it that they knew how harmful above ground nuclear testing was, or agent orange, or the burning of toxic wastes in the field in both Gulf Wars, and now PFAS that could be the root cause of a massive increase in Parkinson’s especially among members of the military who lived on some bases.

We may never know how widespread the plume on Whidbey was, nor how many people who lived near the base or in the Oak Harbor area and were exposed to PFAS and developed Parkinson’s Disease. Read the article in Wired to learn the whole story.

If you subscribe to Apple News you can read it as part of your subscription. Also your local library probably has an issue. Or you can buy it on a newsstand, like at airports.

https://pacific.navfac.navy.mil/Facilities-Engineering-Commands/NAVFAC-Northwest/Our-Services/Environmental-Stewardship/Environmental-Restoration/PFAS-Groundwater-and-Drinking-Water-Investigation/Naval-Air-Station-Whidbey-Island

ToxicDocs database of industry documents

From the Press release of Collaborative for Health and Environment.


Greetings CHE Community,

I hope you’re all doing well on this 10th annual Children’s Environmental Health Day! This national observance offers opportunities to raise awareness, celebrate successes, and share new initiatives protecting children’s health.

To mark the day we’re sharing a new collection of articles from leading experts in the latest issue of the SF/Marin Medical Society Journal. See commentary from Dr. Bruce Lanphear,Dr. Anne-Louise Ponsonby, Nse Obot Witherspoon, and others in a special children’s environmental health section of the journal, available now in the CHE Resource Library. See the full list of articles and authors below.

For those in Northern California — there’s still time to get your tickets for our in-person fundraising event on Sunday, October 26 to support our Zero Breast Cancer program! You’ll hear UCSF’s Dr. Kimberly Badal and CHE advisory team member Dr. Ted Schettler discuss cutting edge research on chemical mixtures and breast cancer risk, and enjoy a gorgeous seaside walk along the Bolinas bluffs. If you’re not in California — or can’t make it but would like to contribute — please make your donation here. Many thanks to those who’ve already purchased tickets! 

We hope you can join us for these upcoming webinars:

On Tuesday, October 14 at 11am PT/2pm ET we will host ToxicDocs: A database of once-secret chemical industry documents. The ToxicDocs website contains millions of pages 

dusty pile of paper documents

of industry documents about lead, asbestos, silica, PCBs, and other toxic substances. This collection includes internal memoranda, emails, slides, board minutes, unpublished scientific studies, and other documents that became publicly available through toxic tort litigation. The resource has been tapped by researchers, journalists, and others exploring environmental health risks. In this webinar one of ToxicDocs’ founders, Dr. Merlin Chowkwanyun, will give an overview of this growing dataset, introducing the interface, explaining the technology behind it, and offering a tour of the searchable content. RSVP here.

Science Panel to discuss the Research and Monitoring Topic in the draft 2026-2030 Action Agenda

From the Puget Sound Partnership

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
October 6, 2025

MEDIA CONTACT: Ian McCabe, 564.669.4628, ian.mccabe@psp.wa.gov 

The Puget Sound Partnership Science Panel will meet online and at Hotel Leo, Leo Lounge, 1224 Cornwall Ave, Bellingham, WA 98225 and online on Wednesday, October 8, from 9:30 a.m. to 3:15 p.m. and Thursday, October 9, from 9:00 a.m. to 2:30 p.m.

We will be providing an all-virtual livestream of this meeting, through TVW. 

TVW web link for October 8: https://tvw.org/video/puget-sound-partnership-science-panel-2025101017/?eventID=2025101017  

TVW web link for October 9: https://tvw.org/video/puget-sound-partnership-science-panel-2025101018/?eventID=2025101018  

The full Science Panel agenda and meeting materials are available through our board meetings page at: https://psp.wa.gov/board_meetings.php.

Meeting highlights include:

  • A presentation and discussion about the status of priority federal policies and appropriations related to Puget Sound recovery. Presentation by Ahren Stroming, special assistant for federal affairs at the Puget Sound Partnership. Read more.  
  • A presentation summarizing a 2023-2025 Puget Sound Research project: Remote Sensing-Based Evaluation of Dungeness River Restoration. Presentation by Scott Redman, science director at the Puget Sound Partnership, and Phil Roni, vice president of Cramer Fish Sciences. Read more.
  • A presentation about the Research and Monitoring Topic in the 2026-2030 Action Agenda. The presentation will include an overview of multiple issues raised during the partner review period for the Science Panel to discuss. Presentation by Scott Redman, science director at the Puget Sound Partnership. Read more. 
  • A presentation on Washington Sea Grants Fellowship programs and an introduction to current fellows. Presentation by Scott Redman, science director at the Puget Sound Partnership about the. Read more.
  • A presentation and discussion about recommendations from the Puget Sound Ecosystem Monitoring Program (PSEMP) Human Health Scoping and Inventory Project. Presentation by Katrina Radach, PSEMP manager at the Puget Sound Partnership, and Marguerite Pappaioanou, Science Panel member. Read more.
  • A presentation and discussion about the Whidbey Basin Cumulative Effects Evaluation. Presentation by Raquel Gilliland, monitoring program effectiveness analyst at the Puget Sound Partnership, and Mike LeMoine, director of Skagit River System Cooperative. Read more.
  • A presentation and discussion about science to support the Implementation Strategies. Presentation by Scott Redman, science & evaluation director at the Puget Sound Partnership, and Joel Baker, director at Puget Sound Institute, and Andy James, senior research scientist at Puget Sound Institute, and Angela Adams, environmental protection specialist at the Environmental Protection Agency. Read more.
  • A discussion about values on the Science Panel and how these values shape Science Panel’s work and discussions. Discussion led by Chair Kelly Biedenweg, chair of the Puget Sound Partnership Science Panel.

The full Science Panel agenda and meeting materials are available through our board meetings page at: https://psp.wa.gov/board_meetings.php.

If you need special accommodations to participate in this meeting, please notify Boards Program Coordinator, Amber Raney, at 564.999.0527.


About the Science Panel

The Science Panel’s expertise and advice are critical to the Puget Sound Partnership’s efforts to develop a comprehensive, science-based plan to restore Puget Sound. The members, appointed by the Leadership Council, are chosen from the top scientists in Washington state.

About the Puget Sound Partnership

The Puget Sound Partnership is the state agency formed to lead the region’s collective effort to restore and protect Puget Sound. Working with hundreds of government agencies, Tribes, scientists, businesses, and nonprofits, the Partnership mobilizes partner action around a common agenda, advances Sound investments, and tracks progress to optimize recovery.

For more information, go to www.psp.wa.gov.

The pathogen killing starfish is found

From The Tyee this morning. Article authored by Kristen de Jager for the Tyee.ca

Sea star wasting disease has devastated marine ecosystems for over a decade. Scientists in British Columbia have identified Vibrio pectenicida FHCF-3, an infectious bacterium, as the cause of the disease.

Read the whole story and donate to the work of Tyee.ca

https://thetyee.ca/News/2025/08/04/We-Finally-Know-What-Killing-Starfish/?utm_source=daily&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=040825

Clallam County MRC Letter re: 3 Crabs road flooding

The Clallam County MRC has sent this letter to the Clallam County Board of Commissioners (BOCC) and the Clallam County Department of Community Development (DCD).RE: Shoreline management at Three Crabs Road.

At its recent monthly meeting, the MRC agreed to invoke its advisory responsibitity to the BOCC and communicate our concern about shoreline armoring (permitted and unpermitted) on Three Crabs Road, which recently came to our attention.

What we are seeing

Despite Comprehensive Plan policies for protecting marine shorelines and no-net-loss goats of the Shoreline Management Program, bulkheads have been and continue to be permitted – most often under emergency provisions following erosion from extreme storm surges, which are almost becoming an annual occurrence. ln addition, NASA has recently concluded that the pace of sea leveI rise is faster than previously thought, due to the thermal expansion of the ocean’s mass.

Summary of concerns

The MRC is concerned that intensifying weather conditions wit[ continue to cause erosion and that emergency bulkheads will continue to be requested and built, one property at a time, resulting insignificant impacts on shoretine functions and ecology. We urge the BOCC and DCD to develop a strategy that comprehensively addresses property and shoreline protection on Three Crabs Road.

The strategy shoutd include continued education and outreach to planners, contractors, property owners and county residents overall, and should also:

> clarify that avoidance of ecologicaI impacts is the top priority (but if avoidance is impossibte then

Ecology’s sequence of mitigation actions for shorelines should be followed and

> consider adjacent impacts and cumutative effects of any action; and

> identify mitigative approaches if avoidance is impossibte; and

> provide how no net loss witt be achieved through compensatory mitigation.

How to Find Climate Data and Science the Trump Administration Doesn’t Want You to See

Eric Nost, University of Guelph, and Alejandro Paz, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)

Information on the internet might seem like it’s there forever, but it’s only as permanent as people choose to make it. This is clear as the second Trump administration has taken steps to dismantle science agencies and remove data and websites they use to communicate with the public, especially regarding climate science.

We are researchers in a network called the Public Environmental Data Partners, a coalition of nonprofits, archivists, and researchers working to ensure that data remains available to the public.

In the first few weeks of Trump’s second term, at least a dozen climate and environmental justice tools were removed. Government websites also scrubbed terms like “climate change” and “resilience.”

Why government websites and data matter

The internet and access to data are crucial for innovation, research, and daily life. Climate scientists use NASA satellite data and NOAA weather records to understand changes in the Earth system and how to protect economies reliant on specific climates. Other researchers use census data alongside climate data to identify who is most affected by climate change. Every day, people visit government websites to understand how to protect themselves from hazards and to learn about climate change policies.

When data and tools are removed, the work of scientists, civil society organizations, and government officials can grind to a halt. Data generated by government scientists is vital, especially for state governments that rely on federal data to run environmental protection programs.

Removing data from websites also makes it harder for the public to participate in key democratic processes, such as commenting on regulatory changes. It also breeds mistrust in the government and science. Federal agencies have been providing climate data to the public for years, and removing this data deprives everyone of essential information.

Bye-bye data?

The first Trump administration removed discussions of climate change and climate policies from government websites. However, in research with the Environmental Data and Governance Initiative, we didn’t find evidence that datasets were permanently deleted. The second Trump administration seems more aggressive, with more rapid removal of information.

In response, Public Environmental Data Partners have been archiving climate datasets, uploading copies to public repositories, and cataloging them to ensure they’re accessible if removed from government websites.

Maintaining tools for understanding climate change

The administration has targeted tools like dashboards that help visualize the social dimensions of climate change. For example, the Climate and Economic Justice Screening Tool, which mapped marginalized communities expected to experience severe climate impacts, was taken offline after Trump’s first executive orders. The original data behind the tool is still available, but it’s harder to find and access. Because the tool was an open-source project, it’s being recreated by archivists.

Preserving websites for the future

Some webpages have gone offline, such as the 25-year-old Climate Change Center at the Department of Transportation. Other pages, like those on the EPA website, have had their “climate change” links removed, making it harder to find relevant information.

Thankfully, the End of Term Web Archive has captured snapshots of government websites, making them accessible through the Internet Archive’s Wayback Machine. This initiative has been ongoing since 2008, capturing millions of government webpages for preservation.

If you’re concerned about missing climate change discussions on government websites, you can use the Wayback Machine to check past versions of pages.

What you can do

You can find archived climate and environmental justice datasets and tools on the Public Environmental Data Partners website. Other groups are archiving datasets linked to Data.gov and making them accessible in other locations.

Researchers are also uploading datasets to searchable repositories like OSF (Center for Open Science). If you’re worried that certain data might disappear, the MIT Libraries’ checklist provides steps on how you can help safeguard federal data.

Narrowing the knowledge sphere

It’s unclear how far the administration will push to remove or hide climate data, but it’s already clear that such actions are narrowing the public’s understanding of climate change, leaving communities and economies vulnerable. While data archiving can help preserve some of this information, there is no replacement for government research infrastructures that produce and share climate data.

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license.

A look inside Puget Sound’s declining bull kelp beds – Seattle Times

The Seattle Times has a good overview of the collapse of Bull Kelp, a fundamental plant to the health of Puget Sound. The article, found here, (behind the Times paywall) discusses the issues of the falling numbers of acres of Bull Kelp and its meaning to the Sound. Kelp is another indicator species, since kelp beds are nurseries for many fish and crab. We should be extremely concerned about what vanishing kelp beds mean to the entire web of life in Puget Sound. Locally, in the North Sound and Strait, the Marine Resources Committees (MRC) have been actively involved in monitoring the kelp beds. If you want to get involved, contact your county MRC.

Kelp has vanished from about 80% of the shorelines around which it once grew in Puget Sound, according to a 2023 report from Washington’s Kelp Forest Monitoring Alliance. South of the Tacoma Narrows Bridge, the bull kelp beds are down some 90%. Around Bainbridge Island, they’ve all but disappeared entirely.

https://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/climate-lab/a-look-inside-puget-sounds-declining-bull-kelp-beds

Risk Specific Farm Salmon Pathogens (new)

Just in from Alexandra Morton, the leading net pen researcher in the world. Now the science gets even clearer as follows:

Just published! In-depth review of the risk specific farm salmon pathogens causes BC salmon populations. It’s no coincidence the 1st generation of chum that went to sea after salmon farms were removed from the Discovery Islands are returning in larger numbers than we have seen in a long time. We explain why some DFO fish farm science cannot be relied on if you want wild salmon. Huge thanks to my incredible co-authors! This entire edition of Science Advances examines the real cost of salmon farming… https://www.science.org/toc/sciadv/10/42..

Contents | Science Advances 10, 42

Our local representative from Taylor Shellfish has long trashed her in public and is always given a free podium at local Marine Resources Committee meetings to promote his opinions which have never been based in science, but what appears to many as simple character assassination (he has stated numerous times she is not a “real” scientist). The next time you buy shellfish, remember that Taylor Shellfish has been at the forefront of working to discredit her work. Because of the work of businesses attacking her like that, it took years longer to deal with the problems our salmon are facing.

Dabob Bay conservation area expands by nearly 4,000 acres

Peter Bahls and his organization the NW Watershed Institute, have pulled off another successful land transfer that they’ve been working on for years in the waning days of public lands commissioner Hilary Franz’ administration. But the agreement may also find itself strapped for funds if the Climate Commitment Act (CCA) is reversed in the next election or a Republican takes office to replace Franz. Your vote is important to passing this . Our website is supporting King County Commissioner and former State Representative Dave Upthegrove as the next land commissioner because of issues such as this.

QUILCENE — The Dabob Bay Natural Resources Conservation Area has been expanded by 3,943 acres to include more than 11,000 acres around the bay.

Hillary Franz, the state Commissioner of Public Lands, signed an order on Sept. 23.

“Dabob Bay is a unique and special landscape, and I am incredibly happy to protect and preserve public lands there so that future generations get to enjoy its beauty and ecological importance,” Franz said. “This further expansion is a testament to years of hard work from stakeholders and staff to find a solution that protects these rare ecosystems while still supporting local services in east Jefferson County.”

To read the whole story, go to:

https://www.peninsuladailynews.com/news/dabob-bay-conservation-area-expands-by-nearly-4000-acres/

support local journalism subscribe to the Peninsula Daily News.