Protection Island & Dungeness Spit – enviros vs enviros

When I was a boy, my grandfather and I would walk the hills of the Appalachian Mountains behind their home. These hills were where anthracite coal was first mined, and the environmental destruction was enormous. By the time I was a kid, the mines were played out and the town was desperately trying to survive. As we walked, grandfather would point out various birds. There was one in particular, the Blue jay that we would hear squawking, “Hear that bird?” he asked one day, “Sure” I answered.

“What is that Jay screaming?”

“I don’t know.”

“It’s screaming ‘Jew, Jew, Jew Jew”. And yes, it did sound like that to my young ears.

This was my grandfather attempting to show me that sometimes, the world was going to be screaming bad things and I would have to just assume it was as crazy as that Blue jay.

Recently, a friend told me that noted birder Steve Hampton was publicly claiming I am a racist because I don’t support his position on the proposed transfer of Protection Island and Dungeness Spit Wildlife Refuges to the Jamestown S’Klallam Tribe. He has apparently posted this charge on the bird watching listserv called Tweeters. I had no idea Tweeters even was a thing, so I joined up and sure enough, Steve was on there making his case that I am a racist. Why? Because other birders of note were agreeing with my position. It must have shook Steve.

The idea that I’m a racist is bizarre and ridiculous. I moved to the Pacific Northwest in 1978. As a photo journalist in 1975 I was the only white person allowed inside the Menominee Warrior Society takeover of an Abby. I was accepted by both the Tribe and the American Indian Movement members who were there. I went through the sweat lodge with them during the occupation. I was covering the story for an international news outlet. I remained inside for 30 days until they surrendered to the National Guard. I was arrested, but never charged with any crime.

Since 2007 I have been running this blog to help people understand the environmental issues on the Peninsula. Since Mr. Hampton is a recent transplant from California, with a limited knowledge of our area, he must be unfamiliar with my credentials to have an opinion on this proposal. You can make your own decision.


I worked for the Jamestown S’Klallam Tribe for about five or six years in the 2010s, producing two films for them under the guidance of a tribal elder, the late Marlin Holden, a good friend. Last I heard this film is in their tribal library. Since we were filming sensitive tribal activities the Tribe did not want the film online. I agreed.

I went before the Tribal Council on numerous times to get funding and renew funding for the project and update the Tribal Council on the projects. My film, “ Treaty Resources “ documented many of the Tribes activities around fishing, hunting geoduck sales, etc. During that filming I became acquainted with Tribal Chair Allen, the entire Tribal Council, many tribal elders and leaders and the late Kurt Grinnell. I sat in on a variety of tribal meetings and activities. I interviewed Ron Allen for the introduction to the film. I was honored to have been told I was the only white filmmaker ever to be allowed to film the annual tribal meeting.

Also, I was a member of the Jefferson County Marine Resources Committee for eight years including chairing it for two. In that role, I worked closely with the Jamestown Tribe to promote Olympia Oysters being restored to Dungeness Bay. In that role, I met with and discussed issues with Billy Frank Jr. I was surprised that he always seemed to know my name, even though I was a minor actor in many of the issues of that day. I filmed one of his last speeches in Port Townsend, which is publicly available on Soundcloud.

I worked as a volunteer photographer with Hazel Wolff, Helen Engle, Seattle, Audubon, Lorna Campion, who is now known as Lorna Smith and a noted environmental activist, and the late Eleanor Stopps documenting Protection Island and helping get it passed back in the 1980s. I did one of the last interviews with Eleanor before her death. It was because of Eleanor and the work of thousands of others that Protection Island became a National Wildlife Refuge. I have seen the archives in the UW Allen Library of the letters of support from the community to the Senate hearings. Steve Hampton’s name is not in that list.

The idea that I am a racist is laughable and pathetic that someone of Steve’s stature would be claiming it. The reason he does is because on the issue of the Tribe and their request to have these two refuges given to them, I am on the opposite side from Steve. For good reason.

I have documented what the tribe has done and said on this blog for over twenty years. You can search Protection Island and Dungeness Bay and see the vast variety of factual reporting that I have done on the various things that have happened there over those years. I have been an ardent supporter of much of what the Tribe has done over that time. I think that Ron Allen is an exceptional leader and the Tribe is successful because of his leadership.

It is sad that I and others find ourselves opposed to this land transfer that Ron Allen has asked for. No one else other than the Tribe has asked for this. Everyone is satisfied with the Tribe’s co-management of our national wildlife refuges. But make no mistake, the tribe is an economic juggernaut, with many successful businesses including aquaculture.

That I have been clear is based on the words and deeds of the Tribe. It is a fact that the Tribe, once they helped cleaned up Dungeness Bay, have filed to put an oyster farm inside the Bay, essentially abutting the Wildlife Refuge in the shallows that many birds, some rare, feed in. The original farm they took over was a small affair. But the tribe publicly stated they were going to expand it and put over 110,000 bags of oysters on the benthic layer. Eventually they reduced that number to 80,000. They attempted to do this in conjunction with the USFW. The Tribe did not receive a permit to operate from the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) responsible for the Refuge, nor did this agency agree to follow its law to write a compatibility determination (CD) determining whether the oyster operation would harm the Refuge. Protect the Peninsula’s Future; Coalition to Protect Puget Sound Habitat and Beyond Pesticides (Plaintiffs) sued the agency. That lawsuit is still pending. The Tribe is not happy that they are being blocked legally from proceeding with this oyster farm. They have downplayed the danger to the birds from both the Bay and Protection Island that feed there. .

As to the Land Transfer in question of Dungeness Spit and Protection Island.

I have never accused the Tribe of the issues that Mr. Hampton is saying that I said on my blog. I have no idea why he seems to think this is related to the Makah and their battle to hunt whales, which has nothing to do with Protection Island. The Whales were under Federal Protection, once the land transfer happens, that is no longer true of the island and the spit.

But, to be clear, I am very concerned about this land transfer. Why?

  1. It was done in secret for months before becoming public. It has been documented that the discussions started in 2025 and were not made public until April of 2026. That is a fact. U.S. Representative Emily Randall worked in secret with the Tribe without any public input until it was leaked.
  2. No one but Tribal Chair Ron Allen wanted this. It was his request, understandably because it would be a great legacy as he nears retirement. I don’t blame him for attempting this. If I were in his shoes, it makes sense while the world is terrified of the Trump Administration and their Project 2025 statements that they want to get the federal government out of management of all our National Wildlife Refuges as well as our Parks. But this was not a proposal of USFW nor any of the environmental groups involved in Protection Island birding.
  3. The Tribe will be responsible for many of the federal laws as he states. I never stated they would not. This is Mr. Hamptons interpretation of what I said. He never reached out to me to ask for clarification. However, once transferred to the Reservation status, the two refuges will no longer be refuges. I have researched this and all my research says this is accurate. I would like Mr. Hampton to provide proof that this is not true.
  4. The Tribe runs a multimillion dollar business in aquaculture. I discussed this at length with the late Tribal Resources head Kurt Grinnell during my interviews with him. That is a fact, not a guess. They sell their geoduck to China. It is a daily business shipping the geoducks through SeaTac. They sell oysters to numerous outlets throughout the Northwest. I have no issue with either of these facts. Never have. My issue is that they appear to be willing to trade off bird protection for tribal profit. I get it. I oppose this one proposal. As far as I am concerned, as only one person, I’m fine with their Sequim Bay oyster farms and other efforts.
  5. If the Tribe gets Dungeness Spit and Protection Island they will be in control of it’s fate, as it relates the fact that the reservation is a sovereign nation. The Tribe will have no legal reason to take any input other than their own into their decision making processes for the two refuges. To validate this, all Mr. Hampton needed to do was look it up. It’s all online about sovereign nation status.
  6. This status means that it is nation to nation treaty negotiations, and as such no longer is accountable to county or state laws governing the two refuges. This should be concerning to all birders.
  7. Tribal Chairwoman Loni Greninger-Grinnell was quoted in the Port Townsend Leader on May 6, 2026: “We can take our own resources more freely, invest it, keep the public access open and maintained. It’s just about widening what we are able to do now versus being tied to another government that has its own rules and its own opinions on how we do things.”
    1. Public access is not the issue. The issue is protection of the birds. How can we not worry about the meaning of that statement? She is saying that the Tribe does not want to be “tied” to the U.S. rules and can do what it feels is best? What does that really mean given their proposed oyster farm?
  8. There are many more questions I raise on my blog about this proposal. Nothing I have heard from the Tribe in public statements makes me change my concern for their desire to take control of these two refuges and possibly turn them or the waters next to them, into monoculture aquaculture farms. Mr. Hampton simply takes their word for their good intentions. I don’t trust anyone’s good intentions. I like to see things in writing. Even then, once in the reservation, the lands would be extremely hard to have any influence over the Tribe. Anyone working with the tribes and tribal law understands this.

As I asked in a public opinion piece in the Port Townsend Leader earlier this year:


There is no provision made for any public input into future Tribal decisions on the use of the island or its shores. It will be up to the Tribe, in concert with the State Department of Natural Resources, to decide if they want to use the island’s shoreline for commercial aquaculture. DNR has been promiscuous in its granting of aquaculture permits. Can we trust that this commercially driven Tribe will make the right decisions on behalf of our refuge when we will have no voice in decisions moving forward?

Ron Allen is a great tribal leader. But Ron has been very clear to the public on his position. Here’s what he said at a meeting of the Jefferson County Commissioners earlier this year. Do you agree with this?

“So to go to your first question, that you raised Greg: [Greg Brotherton, County Commissioner] What initiated this to start with? So, we have an oyster farm inside of the Refuge……We ran into a buzzsaw with [U.S.] Fish and Wildlife on recertifying [non-native Pacific oyster commercial operations inside the tidelands of Dungeness Refuge] and getting all the permits because we were out of compliance. They raised issues with us which were really not legitimate issues, [ such as seabird impacts](his words not mine! – editor)….Basically we were clashing with Fish and Wildlife over that particular project, and so we got frustrated with them.” And later, “Over the years the Tribe has become really strong conservationists, you know for many different reasons…we’re developers too, so don’t confuse yourself that we’re just conservation-minded.” Could you imagine if this was anyone other than Ron Allen saying this?

So, in fact, it WAS the issue of disagreement between USFW and JST over the Tribe’s plan to expand Pacific oyster aquaculture in Dungeness Bay, inside Refuge boundaries,and the Tribes frustration over failure to get approval for that expansion which set this whole idea in motion.

And later in the transcript Allen says this about Protection Island: “But we decided that why not just take two of them? [Dungeness and Protection Island] … makes it simpler and easier for us? We do have a nexus with Protection Island. Our people would go over there to harvest shellfish. Shellfish was always a big deal for us historically—they would go different places to harvest different vegetation and different purposes that was important to us…So we just felt put the 2 together. It makes more sense for us because we basically wanted to remove [U.S.] Fish and Wildlife and that we can control and manage it –what we think is much more respectful”

And finally, “No, [our frustration is] just U.S. Fish and Wildlife. Yeah, they were coming up with reasons why we can’t establish an oyster farm, which has nothing to do with the Refuge itself. They didn’t want to see it happen, We did farm oysters and clams [traditionally] that is something we did do, just today in the 21st Century, just bigger. And its not just for subsistence anymore, its just for commercial purposes.”

So how much more clarity do you need? The protection of the birds is secondary to commercial aquaculture. Just change the name, what if Taylor Shellfish wanted to do this? Would you still support this?

There are so many unanswered questions. We have not heard publicly that other Tribes support this transfer as they would be affected by this since they also have “usual and accustomed” rights to these waters. Ron Allen also stated that other tribes like the Makah and Lummi are waiting on the outcome of this to see if they can take over all the other federal refuges in the Salish Sea. Do we really want to give away all these federally protected ecosystems?

Facts are facts. The things Mr. Hampton brought up were never stated on my blog. But this is what I believe:

These public lands belong to all Americans including the Jamestown S’Klallam. They were created after hard fought legislative battles by thousands of people including Audubon members. We can leave the situation as it is with the Tribe being paid to manage it and not risk the tribe making a profit over protection.

Let me go on record (again) stating that I am in support of Land Back projects around the country. None of these raised the type of issues that are being raised with this proposal. If Jefferson or Clallam counties wanted to give other non refuge properties to the tribe, maybe the more valuable land in downtown Sequim or Port Townsend, I would be in full support. But I am not in favor of giving away our National Wildlife Refuges after what the Tribe themselves have said that they expect to do with them. How much clearer do you want this put to you dear reader?

If Mr. Hampton wants to ingratiate himself with the Tribe, who cares? I have no problem with him having a position on this. But when he starts throwing around “racism” to try and denigrate the legitimate opposition to this highly sensitive environmental proposal, I can’t help but remembering that Blue jay screaming his call in the trees to my grandfather and me.

Al Bergstein
Editor/ Publisher

Audubon Holds State Meeting in Bellingham

Time to read

4–6 minutes

I just returned from Bellingham where I participated in the state Audubon society that held their annual meeting with chapter leaders and other interested members.

The agenda was to review the successes that Audubon had achieved in 2026 and the policy goals for 2027. Aububon is a powerhouse environmental organization, both nationally and in the state. Given that one of Washington Audubon’s major achievements in the late 1970s and early 1980s was the work to create the Protection Island National Wildlfe Refuge, I was wondering whether there would be any mention of the brewing controversy over the request by the Jamestown S’Klallam Tribe to transfer the refuge to the Tribe. But there was no mention made of it at all.

The primary goal of Audubon nationally is working to reverse the destructive downward trend of wild bird populations . Audubon themselves, though working as best they could, has seen a decline of an estimated 3 Billion birds lost since 1970. Their goal is to reverse this as quickly as possible.

Programs for 2027

Audubon has two main focuses for the state in 2027.

Lights Out Washington Program

A success in 2026 was the adoption of the Lights Out Washington resolution. This program is a state wide effort to educate the public on the issue of mitigating the effects of lights in the night on migratory birds. Huge amounts of light pollution lighten the night sky, whether from cities, harbors, street lights and other general light sources. Anyone walking outside in the middle of the night can likely see stray light sources lighting up the sky. The long term goal is to convince both homeowners, businesses and municipalities to take actions to reduce or eliminate light sources that are not needed. One example discussed was terminal port activities that keep a huge amount of light on all night regardless of whether it is needed or not.

The organization trained the audience to help them prepare for Audubon Lobby Day 2027 to promote additional bills of support for Lights Out Washington and other environmental bills.

Migratory Bird Day

The celebration of World Migratory Bird Day educates the public on challenges of bird migration. Audubon has been promoting an online tool called, “The Migratory Bird Explorer” an amazing compilation of data from scientists and amateur birders across the continent and hemisphere.

Migratory Bird Explorer

Helen Engle Volunteer of the Year presentation

Helen Engle was the president of Seattle Audubon and also Washington State Audubon in the seminal growth period of 1970- 1980s. From Wikipedia: She co-founded various environmental organisations, including the Tahoma Audubon Society, the Washington Environmental council, Washington Wilderness Coalition, The Arboretum Foundation, Nisqually Land Trust, and Citizens for a Healthy Bay in Tacoma. She was a board member of National Audubon Society. The award honors her legacy of environmental activism, a trait sorely missing in so many environmental groups today. I had the honor to meet and travel with Helen to a state convention around 1980. She was a formidable environmental leader.

The Helen Engle Award was given to Alan McCoy from Spokane Audubon. As chapter president he has headed an incredible team of volunteers to expand the chapter and it’s protections for birds in the Spokane area.

Protection Island & Dungeness Spit Land Transfer

I spent a few minutes talking to Csenka Favorini-Csorba, who is the policy director for Washington State Audubon. I asked her about the issue of Protection Island and at first she stated that there is no bill for them to take issue with or support yet so she was not going to comment on it. However as we talked further about the issue, she said that other land transfers, in her opinion, had been very successful. She saw no reason to worry about whether or not the land transfer would be beneficial or not for the birds and the tribes were good stewards of the lands that have been transferred . I reminded her that Jamestown has a significant aquaculture business and that they have already been proposing putting 80,000 bags of oysters on the bottom of Dungeness Bay, right next to the refuge, where diving birds fed .She did not seem to be aware of that or the lawsuit by another environmental organization against the tribe that had stopped this proposal for the time being. Her point of view seemed to be very supportive of tribal land transfers in general saying that the land had been “stolen” (her words) from them long ago and it would be appropriate in some cases to be giving it back to them. (historically it would be more accurate to state that the 1855 treaty that the Jamestown signed along with other tribes ceded land in exchange for the right to hunt and fish in perpetuity. That Treaty and that specific language was the reason for the successful outcome of the Boldt decision in the 1970s for the northwest tribes). I asked her if Audubon Washington might support simply keep things as they were with the tribe co-managing the property so all Americans including the tribe could be able to weigh in on issues of management through the United States Fish and Wildlife. She said that it would be better to wait until the bill came out. It would appear from our conversation that Audubon Washington has little interest in either getting involved in the land transfer when it happens or opposing it in any way shape or form. In her defense, Audubon has to work with many other tribes in the state in order to achieve their goals, and I can understand why they would not be willing to make any statements pro or con until the bill is actually out. I left wondering whether or not Audubon members throughout the state would feel the same way about giving away a refuge that former Audubon leaders including Helen Engle, Hazel Wolf, Lorna Smith (nee Campion in the 1970s), the Nature Conservancy along with thousands of members and the public had spent a huge amount of time putting in the federal reserve system in the first place. That obviously will be a question to be answered next year.

A word from Eleanor Stopps’ Granddaughter about Protection Island

Eleanor Stopps. Named Citizen of the 20th Century in Jefferson County and creator of the Protection Island Wildlife Refuge

Donna Armstrong, Eleanor Stopps granddaughter sent this to me for publication.


Protection Island is more than a place on a map. It is an island in the Strait of Juan de Fuca that provides nesting habitat for tufted puffins, rhinoceros auklets, pigeon guillemots, and many other species. After failed farming and development attempts, parcels were purchased for the purpose of creating a public wildlife refuge. In 1974, Eleanor Stopps (my grandmother) and Fayette Krause of The Nature Conservancy helped create the 48-acre Zella Schultz Washington Seabird Sanctuary.

Over the next decade, Eleanor, Lorna Smith, and many individuals and organizations volunteered to acquire private lots. One example was the “Adopt a Seabird” campaign, which raised $50,000 to purchase 23 lots. I was eight years old when I adopted a seabird.

Now, U.S House of Representative Emily Randall will be sponsoring the Jamestown S’Klallam Land Transfer Act of 2026, which proposes transferring ownership of Protection Island and Dungeness Spit National Wildlife Refuges into trust through the Bureau of Indian Affairs for the Jamestown S’Klallam Tribe.

Eleanor, Lorna, and many others worked tirelessly for years with elected officials and public agencies. In 1982, Congress established Protection Island National Wildlife Refuge, with conservation purposes that included protecting wildlife, scientific research, education, and interpretation.

Since then, Protection Island has been stewarded through collaboration among the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, conservation organizations, scientists, and the public. In August 2024, the Jamestown S’Klallam Tribe joined this framework through a co-stewardship agreement, creating opportunities to include Tribal knowledge and perspectives. When environmental challenges arise, this model brings Tribal partners, public agencies, scientists, and managers together for solutions.

Representative Randall’s proposal would repeal the 1982 law and remove Protection Island from national refuge status and the protection that provides. I am firmly against taking this action and I am sure my granddmother would have been also. Protection Island exists today because Eleanor, Fayette, Lorna, and many others gave their time, resources, and determination to establish it from private land. That history is part of public trust, future generations can believe in a democracy that can still work for them.

To learn more, visit the protect refuges website https://protectrefuges.org and People for Protection Island & Dungeness NWR on Facebook People For Protection Island & Dungeness NWR | Facebook

Editor’s Note: Eleanor Stopps was named Citizen of the Century by Jefferson County for her efforts.

Zella Schultz & Eleanor Stopps

Jefferson County Commissioners Debate & Kill Draft of Wildlife Land Swap Letter

The Jefferson County Commissioners today published a draft of a new version of the letter about their level of support for the proposal to transfer the two National Wildlife Refuges into the sovereign nation of the Jamestown S’Kallam tribe. The final letter would have been sent to U.S. Representative Emily Randall, the politician who has bought into this proposal on behalf of the Tribe, and who has done zero public engagement on this issue. The Commissioners debated the issue and ultimately, after debate, the Commissioners decided not to send the letter and simply pass along the written comments to Representative Randall. This is a positive step, allowing Randall to go get the public input she should have done all along. Randall’s junior status as a Representative has been on display during this entire process, and we are hoping she has learned something from this.


The draft letter significantly tempered their support, clarifying a few key points. For sake of the public understanding the debate, here’s points from the draft letter:

Public Input:

“One central piece of input we’ ve gotten from residents of Jefferson County is a desire for more public engagement about this proposal.” – That is perhaps an understatement.

Importance of the lands in question:

“These sites are not only central to the Tribe’ s heritage but are also integral to the ecological health and quality of life for our entire region.”

Is title transfer necessary?

“…there is concern about losing protections provided with oversight by the USFWS.” Finally the Commissioners are recognizing the very real concerns that moving these lands into sovereign nation status would possibly create.

Hope instead of concrete assurances from the Tribe:

“It is our sense (emphasis mine) that if the island were transferred into trust, the Tribe would continue to manage it to a standard that would meet or exceed federal requirements.” There is absolutely no guarantee that is being given nor could one be enforced if promised once the lands are transferred. It is all based on faith that nothing would ever change. The very fact that this transfer is being considered now is proof enough that some future tribal council would decide on a very different use of Protection Island and Dungeness Spit.

Admission of commercial concerns:

“However, we’ve also heard concerns from several constituents that the Tribe may take a more business- forward approach in managing Protection Island and, in neighboring Clallam County, Dungeness Spit Refuge lands.” Never heard the use of “Business-forward” to describe actual conversion of tide lands into an aquaculture farm before. Also they heard from constituents as if this is a secret project of the Tribe. The Tribe has been very open about this and it has been known publicly for many years. Are the Commissioners that out of touch? Or are they wanting to blame the opposition to the transfer for somehow bringing the Commissioners new information? The answer is “yes” they are trying to blame opponents of the transfer. They did so in the next paragraph:

The Opposition:

“…we have observed a recurring argument among some opponents who use the phrase “public land in public hands” to justify federal retention. Within the context of our region’ s history, there is a certain irony and arrogance in this framing. It overlooks the historical reality of colonization and the systemic dispossession of Indigenous peoples from their ancestral lands. To claim these areas are only ” public” when under federal control ignores the thousands of years of stewardship practiced by Tribes prior to European arrival.”

The opposition doesn’t claim that the lands are “public lands”, they are public by definition. The legal national definition of “public lands” which the Commissioners themselves should be aware of is this Statutory definition: Under 43 U.S.C. § 1702, “any land and interest in land owned by the United States within the several States and administered by the Secretary of the Interior through the Bureau of Land Management… except... Outer Continental Shelf; and lands held for the benefit of Indians, Aleuts, and Eskimos.”, as stated in the U.S. Code. General federal usage: Commonly refers to all real property owned collectively by the American people and managed by various federal stewardship branches.

The opposition doesn’t appear to be ignoring the historical reality, and anyway, what does that have to do with the proposed transfer of these lands to the Tribe? Does the historical reality dictate that we give back the Wildlife Refuges we fought so hard to create by keeping them from “business forward” real estate development? If there is any irony to be found at all in this it is that the Tribe, who claims to have the protection of these wildlife refuges as their reason for doing it, are already engaged in putting a commercial oyster farm of up to 80000 bags of oysters against the very shores of the Dungeness Spit, burying the bottom where many of the birds we are protecting feed.

Who are these two refuges supposed to be for? They were established to recognize that before the Europeans arrived, and actually before the tribes arrived, this island and Spit were “owned” by the wildlife on them. The birds. The American public are currently protecting the habitat of these animals for all of humanity, not just for a “business-forward” entity, no matter who they are or however many generations they have been here.

Given the definition of the Commissioners in this ill worded paragraph, then *all* lands in the U.S. are not public or somehow deserve to be given back to all tribes because we took them all.

The Commissioners should strike that paragraph. It serves no purpose other than add fuel to the idea that somehow anyone opposing this is anti-tribe or racist. The opposition simply wants this co-management to continue.

Finally

“For these reasons, Jefferson County urges the delegation to carefully consider these complexities before advancing the Act.” As usual, when confronted with public opposition, the politicians decided to simply ask for more information and public input by Representative Randall.

To the public and Commissioners, let me simply state that I know the opposition people quite well. Virtually all of them have worked for and possibly even donated to your campaigns. Most of them own homes and businesses in Jefferson County. They pay taxes to this county. They appreciate that you listen to them as well as you listen to the Tribe, a sovereign nation demanding something that no one but them has asked to be given away.

Here is the DRAFT letter