Bicycles, Roads and Safety

Recently, I passed a second year since I returned to bicycling after a long hiatus. In the last year, I logged over 4000 km (2485 miles), hardly a lot by many riders point of view but significant enough for this 73 year old. 

Along the way, I’ve faced  the danger of the road. I ride with a friend who was hit by an impaired driver back in the early 2000s. My friend’s life changed dramatically and he has spent the last decades learning to live with the outcome of that person’s incompetence. He lost his career but eventually got back on a bike, competing in the paralympic class races. He has learned to live with the limitations this driver imposed on him. He is lucky to be alive. The youth who hit him was high and was allowed to get behind the wheel again and eventually ended up in other accidents and killed himself by overdosing. A tragic waste of life. Should he have been allowed to drive again?

Another friend who rides with me was clipped by the side view mirror of the car of an elderly woman who should not have been driving. Luckily for my friend, the injury was not very bad, and he got the license of the driver and the police went ahead and charged her. I assume she is driving again. 

I rode a bike into the rear end of a pickup truck that ran a yellow light, nearly killing myself. I have had a Collie run under my front wheel, throwing me over the handlebars. Any wonder I carry bear spray with me? I narrowly avoided running into a car door while riding on Eastlake Ave in Seattle.

Lately, there have been high profile incidents of bicyclists being killed by drivers. The most recent was a man in Chicago named Riley O’Neil, an urban planner who led the bicycle parking program and other key efforts at bicycle infrastructure in the city. 

Riley O’Neil RIP

Riley was killed while in a bike lane that did not give enough distance from parked cars opening their doors directly into the lane. A car door was opened into the lane, Riley swerved into the traffic lane and was hit and killed by a truck. 

In the wake of his death, I have monitored social media on the incident. A common refrain from some is that somehow the bicyclist is to blame, either for not watching out for car doors opening, or that he shouldn’t have even been on the street (read *any* street) as it is dangerous for bikes. 

It occurred to me that I never hear that in the wake of a car death, that people decide that it was the fault of the driver for getting into a car in the first place. I never hear the road itself is dangerous to cars so the best solution is to not drive. Occasionally, I will read that a certain stretch of highway is “dangerous” and should be fixed and many times, is fixed. We demand that our roads are safe for cars, yet that doesn’t stop more than 44,000 people from dying in car accidents in the U.S. every year. Should those people not have been driving?  Was the road to blame? Was it not safe enough? Do we do nothing to help lower that death toll? 

BC (Before Cars): Victorian people enjoying (?) cycling in the 1890s in the English countryside, note the muddy road, with many bike tracks, which eventually was paved with wood or paving stones to make it easier for bicyclists to ride on!

Our roads were originally built for getting traffic like wagons and bicycles out of the mud of the late 1890s. Bicycles were a huge fad around that time. Cars and trucks were first a novelty but eventually we have become brainwashed that they are the only vehicles that should be allowed. Car drivers demanded that roads be improved for their benefit. The fact that most bicycle riders are also car owners so they pay the same road and gas taxes as those who don’t use bicycles do not seem to matter to the critics. We are often given little attention as road budgets escalate, and yet the minute a road is enlarged, it seems that it is too packed with traffic. Building more lanes is not a solution to traffic. In fact, it seems to make it worse. 

Somehow building more lanes of doesn’t reduce congestion. Any ideas how to do that?

I also hear that bicycle lanes are often “empty” at the given moment a driver passes by. I drive on many roads that are virtually empty of vehicle traffic for the time I ride on them. Should we rip those roads out? No, because we assume that people will eventually drive on them. 

An “empty” road. Should we rip these out as well since they are not being “used”? Or maybe convert them into bike lanes?

Many people I talk to say they stopped riding or have never ridden because the roads are too dangerous. I agree with them. Whether for bikes, motorcycles or other cars, people are more distracted than ever. Huge screens on electric vehicles, cell phones, radio, I’ve even seen women putting on mascara as they drive. It’s all a huge distraction. Roads are poorly maintained, they are often overloaded with cars, with drivers annoyed at the never ending slow speeds they end up driving even on gigantic freeways. 

One type of distracted driver. I’m sure she sees the bicyclist on the road ahead of her.

The answer is not to blame the cyclist. First, you have one less car to deal with on “your” road. That should make your trip faster, not slower. Secondly, the cyclist has a right to be on the road. Third, building more specialized bike lanes will move more traffic off “your” road, which should lead to you getting to the Starbucks coffee line with the other cars that much faster in the morning. 

Drivers upset about bicyclists slowing them down often are then seen sitting in long lines at Starbucks in the morning.

Making roads safer is not just for adults. Children used to ride everywhere. My bike gave me a special freedom and maturity when I was a kid. Now, parents are too afraid to let their children out on the streets with their bikes. How is that an improvement? Why shouldn’t children be safe when riding bikes? Why shouldn’t adults too? 

Kid on “safe” lane in traffic. Are you feeling comfortable with her being there? That’s the kind of lane Riley was killed in while riding. (valleyvanguardonline.com)

Things are improving. Seattle has a sophisticated bicycle infrastructure, promoted for decades by advocacy of the Cascade Bicycle Club and work with the University of Washington. It gets bicyclists off the car roads onto dedicated bike lanes or bicycle paths entirely off the road. Portland and Minneapolis are also very advanced in their bicycle networks. New York, Chicago and other cities are making inroads. Bicycle deaths are down in the last few years (a little over 1000 people died on bicycles last year). 90% of those deaths are adults over 20, meaning 100 of those were essentially children or teens. Do we really want to be sacrificing our children to car drivers? 

Safe bicycle infrastructure. Riley would still be alive if Chicago implemented this on the street where he was killed.

Bicyclists are not without some part of this problem. Many riders don’t wear helmets. They often don’t have lights on their bikes. They ride at dusk or night in dark clothes. 

According to the engineering safety firm ACCRA  “Bicyclists are essentially invisible to motorists at night and hence should and must, per state laws, take the necessary precaution to see and be seen. Every state requires a white front light to illuminate the bicyclist’s path of travel when riding between sunset and sunrise. Front lights are required to be visible typically at a distance of at least 500 feet. Some states require only a rear red reflector visible at a distance of at least 500 feet, whereas some require a rear lamp emitting a red light at a distance of at least 500 feet.”

The newest safety feature is rear facing radar. I won’t ride without it. It’s a game changer to see cars approaching from behind and have the ability to modify my riding to get further into safety. 

Garmin Bicycle Radar System

We have to stop blaming the victims of poor road design, distracted drivers and our inability to demand safer ways to ride, especially in urban environments. Europe has learned how to design for bikes and cars. Tens of thousands ride daily in many European cities. It can be done.  That has not only improved driving in those cities but has drastically reduced air pollution, which kills thousands a year who suffer from asthma and other lung related diseases. 

It will take time, some mistakes in design will be made, but it will improve driving as well as biking. The more people who get out of their cars and into biking will mean improvements in mental and physical health as they improve exercising.

So when you hear of the death of a bicycle rider, remember they were a person with a family, friends,  job and coworkers. The fault was not theirs but the society we have created that ignores the needs of those not able or willing to drive. 

Properly designed two lane road with sidewalk and bike lanes. Everyone is safe.

Good news! E-Bike Rebates continue!

Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) are relaunching WE-bike on March 30. This e-bike rebate program makes e-bikes and certain cycling accessories more affordable for people in Washington state.

People living in Washington ages 16 and up can apply for rebates between March 30, 2026, and March 29, 2027. The program will randomly select applicants monthly starting April 13. Applicants only need to submit one application to be considered for the monthly selections.

Rebates alone will likely not fully cover e-bike purchases. Recipients can reduce the overall cost of e-bike purchases at participating bike shops by $300 or $1,200, depending on income eligibility. They can put rebates toward qualifying models of all three classes of e-bike.

To apply for a $300 rebate, you need to live in Washington state, be at least 16 years old, and have a working email address.

To apply for a $1,200 rebate, you also need to have an income at or below 80 percent of the median for your county. In Jefferson County the Median income is $74,048. 80% of that is $59,238. So many younger people likely could apply for this rebate here in the county.

Qualifying e-bike types

The rebate can be used for qualifying e-bikes, e-cargo bikes, and adaptive e-bikes.

E-bikes have batteries, working pedals and a motor. E-cargo bikes are for carrying cargo or multiple people. Adaptive e-bikes provide extra support or stability.

WE-Bike helped nearly 3,000 Washingtonians purchase e-bikes and related safety accessories in our 2025 pilot program.

University of Washington researchers learned rebates motivated people to buy e-bikes they couldn’t or wouldn’t have otherwise, especially people in lower-income households. Nearly half of rebate recipients surveyed said they used e-bikes to travel to new destinations. In all, we offered rebates to 6,861 out of 37,751 applicants from all 39 Washington counties.

Program funding

This grant program is entirely funded through Climate Commitment Act revenues. The CCA supports Washington’s climate action efforts by putting cap-and-invest dollars to work reducing climate pollution, creating jobs and improving public health.

Other ways to try e-bikes

E-bike lending library pilot program

While many people are interested in e-bikes, not everyone will be able to receive a rebate through the WE-Bike program. People also may not be ready or able to purchase e-bikes for various reasons.

Programs like e-bike lending libraries can help more people try out e-bikes.

Eligible organizations and businesses in Washington state may apply for funding to create lending library programs for employees or communities.

Here’s the website:

The future of inner urban and suburban delivery emerges

While it is easy to get depressed by the current fossil fuel funded federal government and presidential positions on transport, the future is arriving, as it usually does, without any help from the powers that be. The rise of the cargo bike portends a future city with far less gas powered delivery vehicles, less air pollution, and a reduction in vehicles on the roads, which likely will make even car drivers happy!