Dozens Turn Out To Help Imperiled Oysters in Seabeck

I’m still trying to figure out if this is a real story. Hundreds of thousands kicked up by a Navy ship? It appears as if something may have happened during the time a Navy ship was in manuveurs, but it’s very hard to comprehend how one ships’ wake could throw hundreds of thousands of oysters ashore in one swoop. Odd…

8/20 Kitsap Sun
Dozens Turn Out To Help Imperiled Oysters in Seabeck
By Derek Sheppard

SEABECK — Mary-Cathern Edwards was drawn in by the “plight of the oysters.”

Strewn high on the beach at Scenic Beach State Park, hundreds of thousands of oysters were barely surviving on the few sips of water they got each day at high tide.

Edwards and her 10-year-old granddaughter Hannah Holloway-Miller were among about 65 volunteers who showed up Friday morning to the Central Kitsap beach to save the oysters by moving them closer to the water.

More at
http://www.kitsapsun.com/news/2010/aug/20/dozens-turn-out-to-help-imperiled-oysters-in/

Boyer and Austin winning for County Commissioner race

Anti environmental candidate Jim Boyer, who has primarily run opposing the SMP and CAO and vows to attempt to overturn them if elected, has garnered the most votes in the primary for Jefferson County Commissioner. John Austin is running a strong but distance second, and Diane Johnson, also an openly anti environmental candidate, is running a distant third.  The key here is that this is the primary, and Port Townsend was not voting at this point for the south county candidates.

If you value environmental protection in this county, you need to at least vote, if not work for, John Austin’s candidacy. Make no mistake about it, years of hard work to better protect our county’s environment are at stake if Jim Boyer is elected. He has publicly opposed almost any new regulation to protect shores and critical areas, and he is strongly backed by the libertarian “Olympic Stewardship Foundation”, which is also staunchly opposed to any and all new land regulation. He is wanting to roll back the regs, which strikes me as odd, as being a Republican his normal stance is for less government waste and spending. Our county has spent hundreds of thousands of dollars on the latest round of regulations, and now Boyer wants them thrown out. Talk about waste in government!

Jamestown S’Klallam tribe has its own ideas for redeveloping Rayonier site – PDN

8/11 Peninsula Daily News
Jamestown S’Klallam tribe has its own ideas for redeveloping Rayonier site
By Tom Callis
Peninsula Daily News

PORT ANGELES — The Jamestown S’Klallam tribe remains interested in pursuing the redevelopment of Rayonier’s former mill site despite deadlocked negotiations between the company and Harbor-Works.

Tribal Chairman Ron Allen said the Blyn-based tribe, which has developed 7 Cedars Casino and the Cedars at the Dungeness Golf Course, is still hopeful that it will be the lead agency for redevelopment of the fallow property — considered the largest undeveloped land on the North Olympic Peninsula — and become the eventual owner of most, if not all, of the 75-acre site.

In fact, he said, the tribe is preparing to release a conceptual drawing of a Native American cultural center that it wants to build on the eastern edge of the waterfront property.

More at
http://www.peninsuladailynews.com/article/20100811/NEWS/308119987/jamestown-sklallam-tribe-has-its-own-ideas-for-redeveloping-rayonier

Read letter from Jamestown S’Klallam Chairman Ron Allen to Gov. Chris Gregoire
http://issuu.com/peninsuladailynews/docs/jamestownrayonierletter?mode=embed&viewMode=presentation&layout=http%3A%2F%2Fskin.issuu.com%2Fv%2Flight%2Flayout.xml&showFlipBtn=true

Dungeness Watershed Forum August 11th

Fresh water resources are being depleted at a rate that exceeds the rate of natural replenishment through rainfall and snowmelt.  Declining aquifers threaten reliable water supplies from wells.  Seasonal low flows in rivers and streams harm aquatic habitat for endangered fish.  Population growth magnifies these threats to the sustainability of water supplies for people and the environment.

On Wednesday, August 11, 2010, the League of Women Voters of Clallam County will sponsor the first of a series of forums on water issues in the Dungeness watershed.

The meeting will be held at St. Luke’s Episcopal Church, 525 N. 5th Avenue in Sequim from 7 – 8:30 p.m.

Speakers at our first Water Forum include Amanda Cronin of the Washington Water Trust and water lawyer Shirley Nixon.  Amanda will cover hydrology of the Dungeness River Basin, water use patterns and trends, and techniques for protecting instream flows – including acquisition of water rights.  Shirley will cover “Water Law 101” with emphasis on the prior appropriation doctrine and how it interacts with reality in times of water scarcity.

Additional technical experts will be available to answer questions regarding water availability in the Dungeness River Basin and offer tools for what you can do to protect our existing water supplies and ensure a more sustainable water future.

The Water Forum will allow at least 30 minutes for questions and answers.  Informational tables and displays containing more information will be available before and after the formal forum program.

CONTACT:  Sonja Rotter

PHONE:  360/452-2413

Biomass energy meeting set Aug. 6-7 – PT Leader

Through a slideshow of work by Cambridge, Mass. pediatrician Dr. William Sammons, MD, and lively discussion, Duff Badgley of nobiomassburn.org show why they think the incinerators offer a total package that is  “dirtier than coal” and decried by the American Lung Association, increases in air pollution and toxic wastes and decimates forests with false promises of long-term jobs and a hefty bill to taxpayers.

Hundreds of biomass incinerators are planned across the nation, inluding ones in Port Townsend at Port Townsend Paper, Port Angeles at Nippon, two in Shelton, and one each in Olympia and Forks, on the Olympic Peninsula alone.

“The reason we are hosting this presentation is because nobody here knows what ‘biomass energy co-generation’ means,” said Gretchen Brewer of PT AirWatchers. “We’re being asked to give our blessing to a project based solely on the fact that it’s touted as ‘green.’ Is it? Just scratching the surface of the topic raises big questions.”

Read the whole story at:

http://ptleader.com/main.asp?FromHome=1&TypeID=1&ArticleID=27472&SectionID=36&SubSectionID=55

Elwha River’s coming dam removal has scientists flooded with unknowns – Seattle Times

Scientists see much to learn when two dams come down on the Elwha River, beginning about a year from now in the largest dam removal project ever in North America

By Lynda V. Mapes

Seattle Times staff reporter

ELWHA RIVER, Clallam County — From all over the country they came to ponder this river: its gravel, its teal-green waters, its shores and mouth and mostly its future as the site of the largest dam-removal project ever in North America.

Read the whole story:

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2012495725_elwha31m.html

Your vote, your choice. Our vote, our choices.

The ballots have been mailed to us, and should be arriving today, or soon.  We have interviewed some of the candidates, and read the position papers, or worked with,  all of them over the last few years. And so, here are our thoughts, on the best choices for the environment of the Peninsula, and why. The telling thing here is that there is not one Republican candidate running in these races, that can clearly articulate an environmental stand. What I have heard is “roll back protections, to create jobs”, “roll back protections to allow us to do whatever we want on our land”, and of course, that anyone supporting environmental protection is against jobs, against the ‘common’ person. All of this flies in the face of forty years of various environmental protection that has led to higher property values for anyone along the shores of our county (you can ask friends of mine or yours who used to live on the shore prior to these regs). I am more than willing to support the best candidate, be they Republican or Democrat, that is proven to support the environment along with the economy. They are not mutually exclusive.  Germany, for example, is a leader in solar panel technology, as well as clean coal. It can be done. So vote for folks who will get the job done. These are the folks below. Maybe someday, this list will include Republicans. It used to. Dan Evans comes to mind.

United States Senator: Patty Murray

-Patty has continuously fought for environmental protections, including the Neah Bay rescue tug, along with other environmental jobs programs. She can be counted on to do the right thing, given the conflicting issues of the Senate. Additionally, she supports with actions as well as words, veteran programs, so badly lacking after 8 years of war. There is no reason to change this sitting Senator for anyone else.

United States Representative – 6th Congressional District: Norm Dicks

– Norm has demonstrated his support for environmental protection consistently, along with supporting military needs, and job creation. He owns property on Hood Canal, and understands the need to make proper choices for it’s protection. Another example of an incumbent who has earned his keep.

State Representative: Kevin Van De Wege

– Kevin’s has done an outstanding job of getting things done for the environment. After 10 years of trying, Kevin and another Representative got the Neah Bay Rescue tug funded permanently. That alone, from an environmental point of view, earns him the ability to return. A fabulous outcome to protect our Straits. He also listened to people about eliminating fire retardant from our clothing and bedding, and after looking at the facts, and the information that showed that Europe ended the use with no uptick in deaths by fire, Kevin changed his mind. This is enormously satisfying that a politician was willing to modify his beliefs based on science and not the pressure from industry lobbyists. No doubt, a champion for our jobs and our environment.

State Representative Position 2: Steve Tharinger

-Steve has been a great supporter for the environment, including participation in the Puget Sound Partnership meetings here,  among other issues. The two challengers are running out of anger over the Jefferson SMP, which neither Dwyer or Tharinger had anything to do about. You draw your own conclusions. Anti-environmental candidates vs. someone who supports protections. It seems clear.

Jefferson County Commissioner, Dist. 3 – John Austin

This is simple. John has supported, against angry opposition, the Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program. His opponents not only don’t believe in protection of our shorelines, they actively either worked against it for the last five years, or are members of the organization, The Olympic Stewardship Foundation, that is opposing all protections in our county. A vote for either candidate other than John, will serve to roll back hard fought protections that were implemented at enormous cost and the input of thousands of hours of volunteer time.  One of his opponents, has refused to even discuss her thoughts on the SMP.

Think of this, where were these opponents when the hundreds of volunteer hours were being given to put together this SMP?  Now they are here, claiming that the public had no input, which is totally untrue. Over 40 people gave up over 4 years of meetings to give input. The SMP cost the state and county hundreds of thousands of dollars to implement. Vote for the candidate that has a proven track record of supporting a strong protection of our shores. As well as his support for substance abuse programs, home nurse programs, and other beneficial support of our ‘health’ environment.

Having gone to the Democrats fish fry today, I looked for and didn’t find the other democratic candidates running against these folks. Why weren’t they there? How could someone who supports either party, not show up at the largest, most influential yearly celebration of their party?  Just think back, Obama always showed up when possible even though he new some places were Hilary camps. You can’t just walk away from your party because you don’t get their support. This is how the sausage gets made. If you don’t like it, change your stripes.

More on Rayonier Breaking off negotiations

A bit more background from Darlene Schanfald, who has led the opposition to the Harbor Works project. I’ve edited slightly.

“For some years, the City of Port Angeles and some of the business
community looked for ways to reduce Rayonier, Inc.’s cleanup costs
for its hazardous waste pulp mill on the Strait of Juan de Fuca.
This site is on EPA’s CERCLA list, while cleanup oversight is under
the WA State Department of Ecology’s MTCA Toxics Cleanup Program.

BACKGROUND

In 2007, Ecology asked the City to partner with it in determining
site reuse once the former mill area was cleaned.  Ecology awarded
$70,000 to the City for a public visioning process.  Following, the
City and the Port secretly developed another plan.  They would create
a Public Development Authority  (PDA) which would both help decide
the mill site’s reuse, as well as purchase the property, taking on
liability for the site.  The PDA’s liability would then reduce
Rayonier’s.  The State Legislature, under HB 1761, allows government
entities like PDAs, ports and cities to get public funds for
hazardous waste cleanups, while corporations are ineligible for these
funds. Rayonier approved the PDA plan.

On May 20, 2008 he PDA scheme for the public to assume site cleanup
liability came before the City Council with one day’s public notice
and with no public input allowed.  The Council, many admitting they
had not thoroughly read the agreement, the PDA recommended bylaws,
unanimously approved the PDA.  Since, the Port, the City and Ecology
have given the PDA $1.5 million to operate and do "due diligence."
All public funds.

The PDA, called HarborWorks, has been negotiating with Rayonier for
many months for the site.  Roughly, this was HarborWorks’ offer to
Rayonier.  HarborWorks would purchase parts of the site — the area’s
the City and the Port wanted. Rayonier would determine probable
cleanup costs of those acres, subtract from that the value of the
land in its polluted state, and give HarborWorks the remaining sum
towards the cleanup.  HarborWorks would use this money as matching
dollars needed to get state funding and relieve Rayonier of liability
for those areas.  Rayonier did not like that deal and cut off
negotiations with HarborWorks.

Without knowing about the failed negotiations, citizens were on the
street gathering petition signatures to stop any more public funds
for HarborWorks.  Within days, they collected 450 signatures and now
are well beyond that as they continue collecting signatures.  (See
Petition). On July 26, the Peninsula Daily News ran an online poll
asking if people supported or opposed HarborWorks existence.   Almost
700 people responded, nearly 77% opposed.  Yet, on August 5, in an
attempted closed door meeting with Ecology, Harborworks, the City and
the Port will try to convince Ecology to give the PDA promise of
funding that would pay for 75-91% of the cleanup, all the time
telling the public, no public funds would be used for cleanup.

ARTICLE:  Supporters, opponents respond to Rayonier letter nixing
mill site sale
http://peninsuladailynews.com/article/20100726/NEWS/307269997/supporters-opponents-respond-to-rayonier-letter-nixing-mill-site-sale

Things you can do, if you are opposed to this.

Darlene suggests to write Director of Ecology, Ted Sturdevant:
”I oppose public funding for HarborWorks to buy or clean up the Port
Angeles Rayonier property.
Hold Rayonier accountable to pay for the full cleanup costs of its pollution.
BRIEF BACKGROUND
The HarborWorks Public Development Authority was created without
public input, yet publicly funded with $1.5 Million.   It was created
in secret between Port Angeles City and Port and Rayonier.
RAYONIER INC. has a cleanup agreement in place with the State holding
Rayonier FULLY responsible for paying to clean up the pollution its
mill left behind.  This agreement should not be interfered with.”

Huge Humboldt Squid (NOT) found in Discovery Bay!

Geoduck farmer Peter Downey called to tell me that he found an 11 foot long Humboldt Squid (Dosidicus gigas) washed up on his beach on the 26th. Actually, it appears that it may have been a robust clubhook squid, according to some Stanford marine biologists that corrected me!  The squid is not usually found around these waters, but one was caught about a year ago, if my memory serves me well. Downey has a commercial scale, so he weighed the thing in at 59 lbs (!).  Peter took the squid to the Port Townsend Marine Science Center. No idea what the center will do with it, but it’s the largest they’ve seen. Photos by Peter.

Wild Olympics Campaign Website Launched!

 

The Wild Olympics Campaign is a coalition of four Peninsula based environmental organizations and five state and national groups working to protect watersheds on the Olympic Peninsula. These forests and rivers provide local communities with clean water, unmatched outdoor recreation opportunities and sustain our outstanding Peninsula way of life. They are vital to the health of Hood Canal and Puget Sound and are critical habitat for wildlife, steelhead and salmon. The Campaign is working with local citizens and community leaders to establish new Olympic National Forest wilderness, Wild and Scenic Rivers and willing-seller National Park designations for these special places.

Over the past year, the Campaign has been reaching out to local stakeholders and Tribes to build support, listen to concerns and get feedback on their draft proposal. They have met with timber interests, local elected officials, Tribes, conservation groups, backcountry horsemen, mountain bikers, businesses, shellfish growers, community leaders, sport and commercial fishermen and other local residents. Along the way, the Campaign has refined their draft conservation vision to address many issues and requests from different local constituencies. They continue to reach out to different groups to grow support, work to address concerns and refine the draft proposal today.

The Wild Olympics Campaign is committed to continuing a community based process and thus, have launched a Wild Olympics Campaign website: www.wildolympics.org

As the Wild Olympics Campaign enters a new phase of public consultation, they invite you to join the discussion. Please review the latest revisions to our draft discussion maps and give your feedback in the comments section.  If you like what you see, please join the more than 1,500 other Olympic Peninsula residents who have voiced their support for the Wild Olympics Campaign by signing on to the online petition here: http://wildolympics.org/take_action

The Wild Olympics Campaign is:  American Rivers, American Whitewater, The Pew Environment Group’s Campaign for America’s Wilderness, North Olympic Group – Sierra Club,  Olympic Forest Coalition, Olympic Park Associates, Olympic Peninsula Audubon Society , The Mountaineers, Sierra Club, Washington Wilderness Coalition

Joint Clallam Cty/Jefferson County MRC meeting Aug. 3rd

The Clallam County Marine Resources Committee (MRC) will meet jointly with the Jefferson County MRC on Tuesday, August 3 at the Cape George Colony yacht club on Discovery Bay.  The meeting starts at 6:00 PM and features a historical review of Northwest Straits Commission sand lance data and a presentation of the Draft Management Plan for the proposed Protection Island Aquatic Reserve.

Robert Vreeland
Clallam County MRC
360-457-0239

State to take new look at how much fish is safe to eat.

ed- It is somewhat upsetting to read that the tribes found out (through a grant paid for by the taxpayers of the state), that levels of toxins were far higher than thought, or safe, and yet we have had no warning and apparently you could assume they were selling this to restaurants and grocery stores. So the question is, “is it safe to eat crab and flounder caught in Puget Sound?”  The answer appears, at least from reading this article, to be ‘no’.  The good news here is that this approach turns pollution control on it’s head. Instead of allowing pollution and reducing consumption, we now are saying that we are going to allow consumption and reduce pollution to achieve healthy goals.

The problem I see is that how do I know that I’m getting safe fish, if the levels have changed but the pollution is still out there in the fish? That seems oddly backwards. Like pretending that the current safe levels aren’t a factor. I think I need better reporting to assure me that I’m just reading this wrong.

 

7/25 Seattle Times
State takes new look at how much fish is safe to eat
By Cassandra Brooks
Seattle Times staff reporter
From the shores of Lake Washington to the Duwamish River and other state waters, signs alert locals about toxic fish:
Warning: Fish from these waters contain high levels of mercury.

Caution: Trout contain high levels of DDT.

Advisory: Shellfish contain high PCBs, do not eat!

Under state law, Washington’s lakes, streams, estuaries and nearshore coastal waters only need to be clean enough for residents to safely consume one serving of fish a month.
Yet, for many state residents, local fish and shellfish are a much bigger part of their diet than that, whether it’s bass caught from the dock of a lake, a dozen oysters served up at a waterfront restaurant or salmon grilled on a backyard barbecue.
And for many tribes across Washington, fish are not just central to their diet but a core part of their cultural and spiritual lives as well.
More at
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2012448836_tribalfish26m.html

A spill in Port Ludlow…sewage this time

7/22 Peninsula Daily News
Valve error blamed for sewage spill that’s closed Port Ludlow Bay
By Charlie Bermant – Peninsula Daily News

PORT LUDLOW — Tuesday’s spill of 5,000 gallons of partially treated sewage into Port Ludlow Bay was because of a “routine operation that went awry,” said the president of Olympic Water and Sewer Inc. on Wednesday. The 1 p.m. spill prompted the Jefferson County Public Health Department to issue a health advisory forbidding any swimming until Friday. The spill occurred during a routine maintenance check after a valve did not close, said Olympic Water and Sewer president Larry Smith.
More at
http://www.peninsuladailynews.com/article/20100722/news/307229996/valve-error-blamed-for-sewage-spill-thats-closed-port-ludlow-bay

North Olympic Land Trust Party and Concert! – Friday July 30 7PM

Music on the Meadow with Kory Nagler and the Good Boys

Friday, July 30, 2010

Bring a lawn chair or blanket. Enjoy beautiful Ennis Arbor Farm

Park at Peninsula Golf Club, 824 Lindberg Rd., Port Angeles

Concert: 7-10 pm

Come around 5 with a picnic if you’d like.

Wine, beer & lemonade available for purchase.

$10 general admission

Children under 15 free when accompanied by adult

Special package deal! $20 for TWO events:

July 30 concert and Aug. 29 StreamFest Smorgasbord

Save $5!

For more information and to purchase tickets please click http://nolt.org/News/Korynagler.html

PT Mill applies to generate electricity – Concerns raised, comment period open

The PT mill, has filed for the ability to generate “green” energy by building a steam fired electricity plant, apparently fueled by biomass (meaning forest slash, etc.), recycled paper, and other reclaimed materials. Some emissions will be increased by this move, some decreased, further evaluation of the request is needed to understand it’s true affects. A public comment period of thirty days has been opened from July 16th to August 18th, but the public meeting won’t be held until August 17th (!). This is a very suspicious move by Ecology, and leads one to wonder about the motives of this permit.  Port Townsend Air Watchers and the Sierra Club have already asked for an extension on this, and this publication also believes that giving one day to the public to comment after the hearing does not constitute a decent interval for concerns about an ‘upgrade’ that will lead to significant new pollutants being dumped into the air we breathe.

The steam turbine would be fueled by “Hog Fuel” which is an unprocessed mix of barks and wood fiber. It is ground up after logging activities. It takes ‘slash’ that might be recycled on the ground and burns it. There is some controversy about this process, and whether it is ‘green’ or not. It appears that it is better than burning petroleum products. But, for example, would we be experiencing as much pollution from this if it were to burn natural gas?

While lowering some pollutants, like particulate matter, and Sulfer Dioxide,  we can expect to see increases in the following:

  • Fuel handling, mainly particulates, read ‘dust’ or ‘soot’
  • Carbon Monoxide pollution will increase by 43 Tons a year. This will bring us up to having 635 tons of CO put into our air, a year. Mainly people downwind or in the plume will be affected.  CO is a major component of smog, and may be contributing to ocean acidification. CO changes into CO2, the major component being considered as a contributor to global warming. It also leads to ozone depletion (remember concerns with the ozone hole in Antartica?)
  • Volitile Organic Carbons (VOC) will be increased by 1.1 Ton a year.

So how “green” is this steam plant going to be? That is debatable. You can add your input on this, learn more, and ask questions, as you will be living with this new pollution levels for decades to come. Questions also have been raised about the affects of stripping the forests of slash.

If you want to ask Ecology to extend the comment period, please call Angie Fritz at Ecology, (360)407-7393.

The copy of the proposed order can be viewed at the PT Library or at :

http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/swfa/industrial/pulp_porttown.html

Puget Sound Chemistry Transformed by Climate Change and Runoff – Scientific American

Puget Sound is becoming more acidic thanks to a combination of agricultural runoff and rising carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere

A combination of carbon dioxide emitted by human activities and nutrient runoff is transforming the chemistry of Washington state’s Puget Sound, according to a new study.

Read the whole story at Scientific American:

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=puget-sound-chemistry-transformed-by-climate-change-abd-runoff

-This threatens our entire shellfish industry, as well as other possible life forms. Runoff is one of the major causes, a reason that we value better shoreline management to slow or stop shoreline runoff. Also, stormwater runoff is another cause, which comes from roads with improperly created storm sewers.  Getting funding at the state level to correct these as quickly as possible is key.

While I have your attention: It may be a good time to review the map, commissioned by People For Puget Sound, done by the UW GIS group. It shows the exact locations of every one of the 4500 manmade storm sewers that empty to the Sound, along with 2123 natural drainages, and 297 DOT created drainages, including bridges.

http://pugetsound.org/pressroom/press-releases/042309stormdrains/?searchterm=storm%20water%20map

John Bailey Sr. 1929- 2010

John Bailey Sr. passed away today, July 11th at Kai Tai in Port Townsend.  John was the partner of Betty Champlain of Port Townsend. He was the father of my wife, Megan, her brothers John Jr. and Bill, along with two sisters, Debbie and Robin.

John and Betty had many happy years together in Port Townsend. They  enjoyed gardening together and sailing a small sailboat around the bay. John was an accomplished woodworker and sailor.

John and his ex-wife, noted sailing writer Jo Bailey, burned a love of sailing into the whole family by sailing the Sound and San Juans in the late 50s and 1960s.

John was a professional photographer, and worked for a number of newspapers in the northwest, ending as a reporter and city editor with the Tacoma News Tribune.

John was the father of not only my wife, who is a Physician’s Assistant, but of esteemed local sailor John Bailey Jr, who many of us have chased around the buoys watching the stern of “Pinger” shame us into becoming better sailors. Son Bill, sailed away from Port Townsend in the late 80s, and has voyaged around the world with his wife, Lisa, and they are currently skippering big sailboats for the elite in Europe.

Debi lives in Olympia, where she is a family counselor.  Robin and her husband, Doug, live in Long Branch, WA, and sews professionally for a living.

John was lately living in Port Townsend, and did a bit of photography for the local sailing club.

Rest in peace, John Sr.

IMG_0051

John and Betty 2006

Peninsula Doctor’s Son Killed in Afghanistan

Dr. Richards, the father of the fallen marine detailed in this story, is a very close friend of our family, and a musical partner of mine in many weekly jam sessions. It is easiy to forget, with a volunteer army, that there are real sacrifices having to be made on behalf of this 8+ year war. This is truly another tragic reminder, of the very real human cost to the US for this war. A father and son is lost, and his musical voice is gone forever.  I have raised a son, and the long memory of all the events, little and big, that went into his life is what we are left with. We can tax ourselves forever and a day and  eventually recoup the monetary costs of this war, but we will never recoup our human losses. Megan and my heart goes out to Dr.Richards. And to all the families of soldiers who will never come home again, or have come home radically altered from the way they left, either emotionally, physically, or both.

Click here to zoom...

An obit of William Taylor Richards is found here.

http://www.peninsuladailynews.com/article/20100708/news/307089991/peninsula-doctors-son-killed-in-afghanistan

Public input needed on DNR plans for Olympic Experimental State Forest

A brief comment period to the proposed forest land management plan for the Olympic Experimental State Forest (OESF) has begun and will end July 15.
Washington state’s Department of Natural Resources (DNR) is evaluating management alternatives that will determine the future of this important area, home to five species of salmon and steelhead, bull trout, endangered Marbled Murrelets and Northern Spotted Owls, and hundreds of other species that have evolved in this complex and wet environment.
Two alternatives are included in the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS): the No Action Alternative (the status quo) and the Landscape Alternative. The conservation community has drafted a better alternative with fewer environmental impacts.

Background: The best remaining older forest and aquatic habitats on land managed by DNR are found in the Olympic Experimental State Forest (OESF). Streams and rivers flowing through forest lands in this region sustain the strongest populations of salmon and bull trout in Washington. Unfortunately, this area—with its steep and unstable slopes—has been left badly damaged by overharvest of ancient forests, roads (and the enormous sediment inputs they cause), and inadequate buffer protection for streams and wetlands The original mission of the OESF was to evaluate current conditions and apply conservation or restoration strategies to bring back healthy salmon and endangered bird habitat, while continuing to permit logging operations. Instead, DNR now proposes to double the level of harvest without funding for research, especially in riparian zones. But DNR has not conducted the research or monitoring to show that this will work over time.
OFCO is conducting an environmental and legal review of the Draft EIS, and we ask that you please support our comments.

Why This Is Important: Your comments will show widespread public support for a conservatively managed Olympic Experimental State Forest.

What You Can Do: OFCO is requesting your support in commenting to DNR by July 15. Points to make in your comments:
Support the OFCO comments with its own conservation alternative which has articles and support from across the environmental community.
Support the Conservation Alternative, which reduces the impacts from DNR’s commercial harvest and closely follows DNR’s Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP). Reject the Landscape Alternative.
The No Action Alternative must reflect current management, not the modeled harvest level 30% greater than that currently allowed. It must be redone.
Timber harvest is not a riparian conservation or aquatic ecosystem restoration strategy! The HCP requires DNR to implement both: “All conservation, research, and management strategies were designed in concert to achieve an integrated management approach.” (HCP, IV.106)
DNR needs to either complete the stalled Marbled Murrelet Conservation Strategy BEFORE completing the OESF Landscape Plan or defer harvest in all those areas identified as potential habitat for this threatened species.
“Current conditions” and “minimum thresholds” are not appropriate points from which to assess healthy riparian function that is intended to provide habitats for fish and wildlife and to restore and protect water quality. The Draft EIS alternatives should use reference conditions from unharvested, healthy riparian habitats.
Landscape planning is a good concept, but requires good baseline data to inform future management. DNR needs to update its site-specific landscape-level analysis program to identify the current condition of watersheds and forest stands, and to tailor future harvest plans and road construction to restore impacted habitats to good condition.
Please send your comments to sepacenter@dnr.wa.gov
with Subject: OESF comments.

For further information:
DNR Site
Settlement Agreement

Remember, the deadline for comments is July 15.

Dept of Ecology Sends Oil Spill Equipment to Gulf – NW oil spill safety net frayed

A fallout of the Gulf fiasco is now that our state is sending both Navy oil skimming vessels, temporarily lowered our oil spill preparedness standards,  and sent essentially our  entire stock of boom and dispersants to the Gulf as well as barges that could be used in the event of a spill here.  This seems like a very bad idea. While personnel can be rapidly deployed, the notion of emptying our supplies and lowering standards is exactly the wrong idea. Accidents and mechanical failure are what this is all about. You have to be prepared for accidents. By emptying our stocks for this futile effort in cleaning up the Gulf, it leaves us more vulnerable to it happening here. We have this beautiful environment here because we didn’t lower our standards or enforcement, we raised them! The Gulf is in this predicament because they have allowed themselves to be controlled by the oil industry and it’s cheerful, “can’t ever happen here” lobbyists and spokespeople, and regulators who lowered the standards!.  We need to not let our guard down. The tragedy in the Gulf is not going to be changed one bit by our sending all our supplies there, but it could be a fiasco for us.

Update – 7 July: It appears that DOE is also considering  sending our rescue tug to the Gulf. I am checking today with DOE on this and other issues.  It appears that neither the Port of Port Townsend, nor county officials were alerted in advance, nor asked if this was a concern to them locally. Discussions appear to be under way with the State, the Feds, our elected federal officials, the Navy, the Tribes and others. There should be clarification on this coming later today, or tomorrow.

——————————————————————————————

OLYMPIA – Navy Region Northwest will soon send five oil-skimming vessels to help with the BP Deepwater Horizon oil spill response in the Gulf of Mexico, pending receipt of Washington Department of Ecology’s (Ecology) official notification on Tuesday, July 6.

Oil-skimming vessels collect oil spilled on water. The Navy earlier sent two of its nine skimmers as well as several smaller work boats from Washington to the Gulf.

Ecology regulates two Navy oil-transfer facilities in Puget Sound. The Navy will keep its two remaining Puget Sound skimmers at their regular stations.

Ecology and the Navy have agreed that the Navy will maintain standing measures, and add interim measures, to help prevent and be sufficiently prepared for any spills that might occur in Washington while the skimmers are helping the Gulf response. These standing or interim measures include:

  • Continuing the requirement for all Navy vessels to be pre-boomed while in port, even if the vessel is not being fueled.
  • Restricting fuel transfers over water to daylight hours – unless there is a documented necessity to support an operational mission. Non-daylight transfers must be approved by a Navy on-scene spill coordinator.
  • Following established Navy directives, orders and other measures that already apply to fuel transfers while in port. These include enhanced staffing levels during all fuel transfers, to include having supervisory personnel on deck and watching from topside to prevent spills. It also means ensuring fueling crews are fully qualified in the Navy’s spill prevention and response procedures.
  • If an oil or hazardous material spill occurs, the Navy must ask the U.S. Coast Guard to activate the services of the Marine Spill Response Corp., National Response Corp. or other private spill-response contractors in Washington to assist with response equipment and personnel. The Coast Guard has confirmed this action will be taken, if requested. Both Ecology and the Coast Guard have agreed to adopt an aggressive, enhanced response posture until the Navy equipment returns from the Gulf.
  • Updating the Navy’s state oil-spill contingency plan that outlines the response actions it will take to minimize environmental impacts from a spill.

“We believe these spill prevention and preparedness measures will help ensure Navy is ready and capable of mounting a rapid, aggressive and well-coordinated response to any spill that might occur while their skimmers are out helping with the Gulf spill response,” said Ecology Spills Program Manager Dale Jensen.

Earlier this week, the U.S. Coast Guard and Environmental Protection Agency announced they had lowered federal oil-spill preparedness standards, including cleanup equipment, to get more resources – especially skimming vessels and other skimming systems – to the Gulf.

The new temporary measures require industry and entities like the Navy to maintain enough equipment to respond to a much more modest but more likely spill of 2,100 gallons.

Washington state law, however, requires the oil industry and other entities that transfer large amounts of fuel over state waters, to be able to respond to a worst-case spill scenario. In some instances, that means oil-handling facilities must be prepared to respond to spills involving millions of gallons of oil and other petroleum products.

Jensen said Ecology has received numerous requests by private spill contractors to send equipment to the Gulf. Ecology quickly established a process to track and evaluate each request from the regulated community. The state agency also is tracking what its federal response partners, including the U.S. Coast Guard and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, have sent.

Ecology has let experienced response personnel, the state’s entire stock of about 15,000 gallons of chemical dispersants and 1,400 feet of fireproof oil boom, several shallow water barge systems, and more than 50,000 feet of oil containment boom go to the Gulf so far. See how Washington is helping the Gulf spill response.

Jensen said, “We are doing all we can to help our neighbors in the Gulf while preserving a core level of spill response readiness in Washington. It also means, however, that everyone must be extra vigilant about keeping oil out of Washington’s waters. It doesn’t matter if you’re at the helm of an oil tanker or if you’re a weekend boater. We need your help in preventing all oil spills, regardless of size.”

A 2004 draft study commissioned by Ecology estimates that if a major spill were to occur in Washington waters, the state could suffer nearly $11 billion in economic losses, and more than 165,000 jobs across the state would be adversely affected, along with the environmental damage.

On May 10, Ecology and the Marine Spill Response Corp. held unannounced oil-spill response drills in five critical locations in Puget Sound to test the company’s agreement with Global Diving & Salvage Inc. to temporary backfill for more than 25 experienced responders as well equipment MSRC had sent to the Gulf. The call-out test was successful.