One Orca, two stories. A way forward?

Over the last few days, I saw two stories that really drove the message home to me that we are very likely to fail at saving the Southern Resident Killer Whales without new thinking, outside the box. And it’s really not a box, but about outside the silos. It’s not some dire story of good and bad guys. Just a reflection of what is our lack of being able to look at the big picture instead of silos of interests. One silo is the scientists along with the Tribes, the other is the sports fishing community and it’s state of Washington Fish and Wildlife people. My intent is not be critical of either side but to point out a gap that is likely going to doom efforts to support the Orca.

Over the last week, the Seattle Times and many other news outlets, covered the story of J50. J50 is the SRKW that is in poor health. Scientists and members of the Lummi Nation, are trailing around with the whales with live hatchery Chinook (King) salmon, the Orcas most favored food (though it prefers them wild from either the Frasier or Columbia river. This  is likely because, over thousands of years, these two river systems deposited the strongest and largest population of wild Chinook, every year like clockwork until white Europeans  arrived about 200 years ago, give or take 50 years. We all know what happened next. ) They are doing this because it is, to the best of our knowledge, that there is not enough Chinook salmon for the Orcas to survive. So they are bringing the salmon to the Orcas in order to see if they can nurse J50 back to health. A  noble and worthy effort.

So while the scientists and tribal members were doing their best to feed this wild animal,  another story caught my eye. The closing of salmon fishing for the summer by the State of Washington.

The Peninsula Daily News reported “Chinook Season Wraps Up”. The article stated:

SALTWATER CHINOOK FISHING has closed for the season for the bulk of the North Olympic Peninsula — while remaining open to hatchery Chinook retention off of La Push and south of Ayock Point in Hood Canal. The state estimated … chinook guideline estimates show that anglers caught 61.7 percent of the 4,900 kings allotted (3,023).

One thought is that if the Chinook fishing is still allowed out off LaPush, and the Orcas have gone there, it must be after the fish. So I’m left wondering, if we really wanted to save starving orcas, why on earth are we allowing recreational fishers to catch 3023 fish? As to the ocean limits, according to state F&W, the ocean recreational limits were:

 27,500 fish, which is 17,500 fewer fish than 2017’s quota of 45,000.

So this is approximately 30,000 chinook we are catching when the story of the day is that the Orcas can’t find these fish in the Salish Sea. And this is in addition to whatever the seals and sea lions  have been taking, The studies on seals and sea lions show that they eat primarily juvenile salmon, not as much the older ones! However the study concludes that the seals and sea lions are a problem.




I have not seen the numbers of the commercial and tribal catch of chinook, but I’m sure it’s higher than 3023 fish.  The State F&W web site stated this spring:

In meeting conservation objectives for wild salmon, the co-managers are limiting fisheries in areas where southern resident killer whales are known to feed. The adjustments will aid in minimizing boat presence and noise, and decrease competition for chinook and other salmon in areas critical to the declining whales, said WDFW.

This seems to say that they state only wants to restrict fishing in the areas where we know the Orca feed. Well, according to what I’ve read, they travel all over the Sound to feed, which is why we see them off Seattle, Tacoma and many other locations. To restrict fishing to some area that they spend more time in seems to be an arbitrary idea of humans as so as to allow fishing to continue.

The facts on the ground (or sea) remain. Some orcas are starving. Many scientists believe we are on the edge of the end of these whales, because the breeding pairs are just too small a number to survive. Calves are dying at birth or shortly after. The Governor has stated that it is unacceptable to lose them and radical ideas need to be implemented. He has dozens of people working on a plan. In the meantime, thousands of chinook are being caught and eaten by us, who have other sources of protein! 

Do we really want to save the resident orcas? Then instead of chasing them with a boat with a few live fish on it, maybe we should consider not competing with them for their food source. Just for a few years, maybe a decade. we may also have to cull sea lions and seals for a few decades to see if it also helps put more fish in the sea, more to placate the fishing interests that routinely claim that they are one of the main competing mammals out there.  The sea lions and seals seem to have rebounded and if the scientists say that a cull of some size is warranted, then let’s do it. Then scientifically see  if things improve. We have alternatives for salmon from Alaska. We don’t need to stop eating the fish. Consider putting a moratorium on catching them in the inland waters and the coast  for five to ten years.This is not a new idea It’s been done all over the world to recover decimated fish stocks. They are called Marine Reserves . It’s a controversial topic to be sure, but it seems to map to our current needs to save the Orcas by giving them more food. And it’s been an idea that many old time fishermen I’ve personally talked to say is needed.

I say this as someone who has done salmon fishing in the Sound in the past, who ate salmon twice in the last three days (and likely will have leftovers of it tomorrow), and who’s son is an avid sports-fisherman with a small boat.

A moratorium is  the fastest way to give more fish to the whales. All other means, whether radical protection of the shorelines, tearing down dams or whatever, will take decades.   But it will take a lot willingness by various groups to put the long range health of salmon ahead of their own short term financial gain and personal pleasure fishing.  Anyone willing to give it a try? If not, why not?








7 Responses

  1. Talk about stupidity! All a person has to do is step back and take a look at what is said in this article! Several years ago nature showed us what needs to be done! The tsunami that hit Japan provided the two thinga most needed – a big supply of nutrients (which fishermen don’t feel they need to replenish), and a major reduction in fishing due to radioactive contamination scare. A few years later, there were major returns of salmon to Western rivers (records for recent years). Atlantic salmon fish farms at least fed their fish. It is a shame that the government fish hatcheries destroyed millions of fingerlings instead of supplying them to the fish farms. But then l guess that just shows how ignorant I am of entrenched political agendas.

    • Thanks for the feedback Jim. It’s gratifying that you went back to an August post! Can you provide me with the science that you refer to that validates your comments, specifically about how there were major runs returning to western Japanese rivers? Or are you meaning *our* western rivers? I’m mindful about always making assumptions as I bet you’ve heard the definition of an assumption. A good laugh there. Anyway, I have never heard that the Tsunami in Japan had anything to do with fish stocks returning in large numbers. Would love to see where that’s documented. My article was simply putting two other unrelated but relevent articles together and asking a question. I can’t determine whether you were calling me stupid, or the articles that I was referencing was stupid. They simply were reporting on facts. I don’t know what you mean by saying tha the government fish hatcheries destroyed millions of fingerlings. When are you talking about? When do they supply fingerlings to fish farms? I don’t think you are “ignorant of entrenched political agendas”, as the agendas are all over the map, having been around them for some time. Who’s agendas? WDFW? DNR? Ecology? The Puget Sound Partnership?
      Local governments like counties and cities? The Governor? The environmentalists? Which ones? The large Seattle based ones agendas or the Olympic Peninsula based NGOs agendas? The Tribes? Which tribes? And let’s throw in the Sport’s Fishermen and the Commercial Fishermen. All these (and likely more! ) have agendas. The Orcas don’t have fish. They are all trying to work out methods to come together and solve the problem, not just sitting on the sidelines and complaining while the Orcas die off. And I just report on these things and ask questions. I have no answers myself and no one seems to care if I do. So do yourself a favor and when you comment, please do some research and make sure myself and my readers can understand what it is you are complaining about. All the best.

  2. […] This website called for a ban on eating locally caught wild chinook over on August 18th.   See “One Orca Two Stories. A way forward?” […]

  3. If we’re going to fantasize about models, how about one that predicts when human political and economic systems will collapse to the extent that our own demise becomes as likely as that of SRKWs?

    Here’s a possible news clip from 20?8: “The last people were evacuated this month from the north Sonoran desert that is no longer habitable most of the year for people without extensive life support systems (most of the Colorado Basin east of Los Angeles and below 1,000 meters). Most of the displaced people have been relocated to Alberta and Pugetopolis which now has 25,000,000 people, and no more salmon, which are now limited to hatcheries on the Arctic Ocean. Fortunately the U.S. fertility rate is now down to 6 per 1,000 so the resource constraints for North America will be much lower within two generations, assuming there are not more millions from Tropical dead zones still trying to reach habitable areas of the U.S. Atmospheric GHGs does seem to have topped out at 550 ppm; scientists are now optimistic that Earth will not transition to a Venus thermodynamic equilibrium.” …etc.

    • Well that’s certainly one possible outcome of ignoring reality. Just trying to focus on the near term solutions.

      • Yes. The curse of getting elderly on top of years of studying systems ecology, history, etc. and thinking about the longer sweep of time. “Civilization is Entropy in Drag” says a Tom Jay bumper sticker from 30 years ago.

  4. I think that your suggestion certainly needs to be taken seriously. And I’d take it a step further. Instead of focusing how to optimize one key variable in the problem, e.g. stop catching chinook to leave more for the orcas, I’d suggest that we need a complex model of the orca ecosystem that will allow us to see what we should be doing in terms of, say, the 100 most important variables. The model will never be perfect, but I think that thinking in terms of complex interactions between dozens of factors, biotic and abiotic, is bound to be better than optimizing a single variable. Digital modeling has come a long way since the early “carrying capacity” computer based studies of the ’70’s, and our ability to model far outstrips our knowledge of what should go into the models. Imperfect as they are, we should still be pushing that really hard, and I almost never hear talk of policy being based on complex ecosystem models.

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: